Episodic Long-Term Memory of Spoken Discourse Masked by Speech: What Is the Role for Working Memory Capacity?

被引:56
作者
Sorqvist, Patrik [1 ,2 ]
Ronnberg, Jerker [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Linnaeus Ctr HEAD, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Gavle, Linnaeus Ctr HEAD, Linkoping, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2012年 / 55卷 / 01期
关键词
working memory capacity; masking speech; cocktail party; size-comparison span; episodic long-term memory; COCKTAIL PARTY PHENOMENON; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; COGNITION; HEARING; NOISE; PERCEPTION; MECHANISMS; RECALL; SPAN;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0353)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate whether working memory capacity (WMC) modulates the effects of to-be-ignored speech on the memory of materials conveyed by to-be-attended speech. Method: Two tasks (reading span, Daneman & Carpenter, 1980; Ronnberg et al., 2008; and size-comparison span, Sorqvist, Ljungberg, & Ljung, 2010) were used to measure individual differences in WMC. Episodic long-term memory of spoken discourse was measured by requesting participants to listen to stories masked either by normal speech or by a rotated version of that speech and to subsequently answer questions on the content of the stories. Results: Normal speech impaired performance on the episodic long-term memory test, and both WMC tasks were negatively related to this effect, indicating that individuals with high WMC are less susceptible to disruption. Moreover, further analyses revealed that size-comparison span (a task that requires resolution of semantic confusion by inhibition processes) is a stronger predictor of the effect than is reading span. Conclusions: Cognitive control processes support listening in adverse conditions. In particular, inhibition processes acting to resolve semantic confusion seem to underlie the relationship between WMC and susceptibility to distraction from masking speech.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 218
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting [J].
Anderson, MC .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 49 (04) :415-445
[2]  
[Anonymous], SPEECH COMMUNICATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], J AM ACAD AUDIOLOGY
[4]   SPEECH PERCEPTION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SPECTRAL TRANSFORMATION .1. PHONETIC CHARACTERISTICS [J].
BLESSER, B .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1972, 15 (01) :5-&
[5]  
Bronkhorst AW, 2000, ACUSTICA, V86, P117
[6]   Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers [J].
Brungart, DS .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (03) :1101-1109
[7]   Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening [J].
Colflesh, Gregory J. H. ;
Conway, Andrew R. A. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (04) :699-703
[8]   The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Cowan, N ;
Bunting, MF .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2001, 8 (02) :331-335
[9]   HOW WE SHOULD MEASURE CHANGE - OR SHOULD WE [J].
CRONBACH, LJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1970, 74 (01) :68-80
[10]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466