Subjective ratings of whole-body vibration for single- and multi-axis motion

被引:14
作者
Mansfield, Neil J. [1 ]
Maeda, Setsuo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Loughborough Design Sch, Environm Ergon Res Ctr, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[2] Kinki Univ, Fac Appl Sociol, Higashiosaka, Osaka 5778502, Japan
关键词
PLUS-Z-AXES; INTENSITY JUDGMENTS; Z-AXIS; DISCOMFORT; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1121/1.3654014
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Real-world whole-body vibration exposures comprise motion in fore aft, lateral, and vertical directions simultaneously. There can also be components of roll, pitch, and yaw. If evaluating vibration with respect to human response, most investigators will use methods defined in ISO 2631-1. This uses frequency weightings that were originally derived from laboratory studies of the subjective responses to vibration in one direction at a time. This paper describes experiments that were carried out using a 6 degree-of-freedom vibration simulator to validate the applicability of ISO 2631-1 in multi-axis environments. Fifteen subjects were exposed to 87 stimuli comprising single-axis, dual-axis, and tri-axial random vibration, to which they were required to produce subjective ratings. It is shown that in this study the root-sum-of-squares method of summation of subjective ratings in individual axes was an adequate technique for prediction of subjective rating of multi-axis vibration. Better agreement between objective and subjective measures of vibration was obtained for unweighted vibration than for frequency weighted signals. The best agreement for this study was achieved when axis multiplying factors were set at 2.2 and 2.4 for x- and y-axis vibration, respectively. Different values could be appropriate for other postures, seats, and vibration conditions and should be determined in future studies. (C) 2011 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3654014]
引用
收藏
页码:3723 / 3728
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   PREDICTING THE DISCOMFORT CAUSED BY SIMULTANEOUS VERTICAL AND FORE-AND-AFT WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION [J].
FAIRLEY, TE ;
GRIFFIN, MJ .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1988, 124 (01) :141-156
[2]   Difference thresholds for the perception of whole-body vertical vibration: dependence on the frequency and magnitude of vibration [J].
Forta, Nazim Gizem ;
Morioka, Miyuki ;
Griffin, Michael J. .
ERGONOMICS, 2009, 52 (10) :1305-1310
[3]   The significance of lateral whole-body vibrations related to separately and simultaneously applied vertical motions.: A validation study of ISO 2631 [J].
Griefahn, B ;
Bröde, P .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1999, 30 (06) :505-513
[4]   ASSESSING DISCOMFORT OF DUAL-AXIS WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION [J].
GRIFFIN, MJ ;
WHITHAM, EM .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1977, 54 (01) :107-116
[5]  
Griffin MJ., 1990, Handbook of Human Vibration
[6]  
ISO, 1997, MECH VIBRATION SHOCK
[7]  
Maeda S., 2005, 13 JAP GROUP M HUM R, P1
[8]   Equal sensation curves for whole-body vibration expressed as a function of driving force [J].
Mansfield, NJ ;
Maeda, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 117 (06) :3853-3859
[9]   Relative Contribution of Translational and Rotational Vibration to Discomfort [J].
Marjanen, Ykae ;
Mansfield, Neil J. .
INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2010, 48 (05) :519-529
[10]   ASSESSING THE DISCOMFORT OF THE WHOLE-BODY MULTIAXIS VIBRATION - LABORATORY AND FIELD EXPERIMENTS [J].
MISTROT, P ;
DONATI, P ;
GALMICHE, JP ;
FLORENTIN, D .
ERGONOMICS, 1990, 33 (12) :1523-1536