Impact of precipitation variation on summer forage crop productivity and precipitation use efficiency in a semi-arid environment

被引:13
作者
Lai, Xingfa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shen, Yuying [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Zikui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ma, Jingyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Xianlong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ma, Longshuai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Pastoral Agr Sci & Technol, Lanzhou 730020, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, State Key Lab Grassland Agroecosyst, Lanzhou 730020, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Field Sci Observat & Res Stn Grassland Agroec, Qingyang 745004, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Pastoral Agr Sci & Technol, 768 Jiayuguan West Rd, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Precipitation variability; Forage crops; Productivity; Water use efficiency; WATER-USE-EFFICIENCY; LOESS PLATEAU; WINTER-WHEAT; LIMITED IRRIGATION; SYSTEMS; COVER; ROTATION; REGION; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2022.126616
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Planting annual forage crops could provide fodder supplies, enhance the development of the livestock industry, and optimize cropping systems in semi-arid regions, but water shortages and variable precipitation limit forage production on the Loess Plateau. To explore forage production under variable precipitation conditions, we conducted 3-year field experiments to evaluate the crop production, water use, water use efficiency, and pre-cipitation use efficiency of three forage crops, soybean (Glycine max L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), and vetch (Vicia sativa L.), under three rainfall scenarios: a 30 % decrease in rainfall (R-30 %), normal rainfall (CK), and a 30 % increase in rainfall (R +30 %). The scenarios were implemented with rainfall-collection-redistribution devices. In 2017, under the CK scenario, the dry matter yield (DMyield) values of soybean, oat, and vetch were 3617.56, 5284.00, and 2631.00 kg ha -1, respectively, and the crude protein yield (CPyield) values were 555.20, 518.37, and 467.57 kg ha -1, respectively. Compared to those under the CK scenario, the soybean, oat, and vetch DMyield values under the R + 30 % scenario increased by 26.25 %, 13.16 %, and 26.38 % in 2016, but the water use efficiency for dry matter yield (WUEDM) increased by 28.04 %, 40.58 %, and 27.77 %, respectively, in 2018 under the R-30 % scenario. Compared to that of soybean, the precipitation use efficiency for crude protein yield (PUECP) of oat was significantly lower, by 32.58 %, 31.19 %, and 27.50 %, in 2018 under the R-30 %, CK, and R + 30 % scenarios, respectively. Across the three growing seasons, under the R-30 %, CK, and R + 30 % rainfall scenarios, oat had the highest DMyield and WUEDM, but soybean had the highest CPyield and PUECP. Therefore, oat and soybean are two suitable forage types for this region, and they could be integrated into existing cropping systems. Under wet conditions, we recommended incorporating oat into fallow-winter wheat and fallow-maize -winter wheat cropping systems during the fallow periods to produce forage. Under dry and normal climate conditions, we recommend planting soybean in fallow-winter wheat and fallow-maize-winter wheat cropping systems to reduce soil water use and increase precipitation use efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] The ridge furrow cropping technique indirectly improves seed filling endogenous hormonal changes and winter wheat production under simulated rainfall conditions
    Al, Shahzad, I
    Xu, Yueyue
    Ahmad, Irshad
    Jia, Qianmin
    Huang Fangyuan
    Daur, Ihsanullah
    Wei, Ting
    Cai, Tie
    Ren, Xiaolong
    Zhang, Peng
    Jia, Zhikuan
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2018, 204 : 138 - 148
  • [2] Late sowing date as an adaptive strategy for rainfed bean production under warming and reduced precipitation in the Mexican Altiplano?
    Arredondo, T.
    Delgado-Balbuena, J.
    Kimball, B.
    Luna-Luna, M.
    Yepez-Gonzalez, E.
    Huber-Sannwald, E.
    Garcia-Moya, E.
    Garatuza-Payan, J.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2020, 255
  • [3] Spatiotemporal variation and tendency analysis on rainfall erosivity in the Loess Plateau of China
    Cui, Yongsheng
    Pan, Chengzhong
    Liu, Chunlei
    Luo, Mingjie
    Guo, Yahui
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 51 (05): : 1048 - 1062
  • [4] Winter cover crop production and water use in Southern Great Plains cotton
    DeLaune, P. B.
    Mubvumba, P.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2020, 112 (03) : 1943 - 1951
  • [5] Replacing summer fallow with annual forage improves crude protein productivity and water use efficiency of the summer fallow-winter wheat cropping system
    Deng, Jianqiang
    Zhang, Zhixin
    Liang, Zhiting
    Li, Zhou
    Yang, Xianlong
    Wang, Zikui
    Coulter, Jeffrey A.
    Shen, Yuying
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 230
  • [6] Effects of precipitation changes on aboveground net primary production and soil respiration in a switchgrass field
    Deng, Qi
    Aras, Sadiye
    Yu, Chih-Li
    Dzantor, E. Kudjo
    Fay, Philip A.
    Luo, Yiqi
    Shen, Weijun
    Hui, Dafeng
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 248 : 29 - 37
  • [7] Diversifying crop rotations with pulses enhances system productivity
    Gan, Yantai
    Hamel, Chantal
    O'Donovan, John T.
    Cutforth, Herb
    Zentner, Robert P.
    Campbell, Con A.
    Niu, Yining
    Poppy, Lee
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [8] Winter wheat grain yield associated with precipitation distribution under long-term nitrogen fertilization in the semiarid Loess Plateau in China
    Guo, Shengli
    Zhu, Hanhua
    Dang, Tinghui
    Wu, Jinshui
    Liu, Wenzhao
    Hao, Mingde
    Li, Yong
    Syers, J. Keith
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2012, 189 : 442 - 450
  • [9] Cover-crop water use and productivity in the high plains wheat-fallow crop rotation
    Holman, Johnathon D.
    Assefa, Yared
    Obour, Augustine K.
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2021, 61 (02) : 1374 - 1385
  • [10] Can Cover or Forage Crops Replace Fallow in the Semiarid Central Great Plains?
    Holman, Johnathon D.
    Arnet, Kevin
    Dille, Johanna
    Maxwell, Scott
    Obour, Augustine
    Roberts, Tom
    Roozeboom, Kraig
    Schlegel, Alan
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2018, 58 (02) : 932 - 944