Comfort and Attitudes Towards Robots Among Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:54
作者
Backonja, Uba [1 ,2 ]
Hall, Amanda K. [2 ]
Painter, Ian [3 ]
Kneale, Laura [2 ]
Lazar, Amanda [4 ]
Cakmak, Maya [5 ]
Thompson, Hilaire J. [6 ]
Demiris, George [2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Nursing & Healthcare Leadership, Box 358421, Tacoma, WA 98402 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Informat & Med Educ, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Coll Informat Studies, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Nursing, Dept Biobehav Nursing & Hlth Informat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Dept Biobehav Hlth Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
aged; attitude; middle aged adult; robotics; older adult; young adult;
D O I
10.1111/jnu.12430
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: To explore the social impact of, comfort with, and negative attitudes towards robots among young, middle-aged, and older adults in the United States. Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional. Conducted in 2014-2015 in an urban area of the western United States using a purposive sample of adults 18 years of age or older. Methods: Respondents completed a survey that included the Negative Attitudes Toward Robots Scale (NARS) and two questions taken or modified from the European Commission's Autonomous System 2015 Report. Analyses were conducted to compare perceptions and demographic factors by age groups (young adults:18-44, middle-aged adults: 45-64, and older adults: > 65 years old). Findings: Sample included 499 individuals (n = 322 age 18-44 years, n = 50 age 45-64 years, and n = 102 age 65-98 years). There were no significant differences between age groups for 9 of the 11 items regarding social impact of robots and comfort with robots. There were no significant differences by age groups for 9 of the 14 items in the NARS. Among those items with statistically significant differences, the mean scores indicate similar sentiments for each group. Conclusions: Older, middle-aged, and younger adults had similar attitudes regarding the social impact of and comfort with robots; they also had similar negative attitudes towards robots. Findings dispel current perceptions that older adults are not as receptive to robots as other adults. This has implications for nurses who integrate supportive robots in their practice. Clinical Relevance: Nurses working in clinical and community roles can use these findings when developing and implementing robotic solutions. Understanding attitudes towards robots can support how, where, and with whom robots can be used in nursing practice.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 633
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, C2010BR03 US CENS BU
[3]  
Beer JM, 2012, ACMIEEE INT CONF HUM, P335, DOI 10.1145/2157689.2157806
[4]  
Boyzatis R. E., 1998, Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development
[5]   Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions [J].
Broadbent, E. ;
Stafford, R. ;
MacDonald, B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2009, 1 (04) :319-330
[6]  
Broadbent Elizabeth, 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, P645, DOI 10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326284
[7]  
Broekens Joost, 2009, Gerontechnology, V8, P94, DOI 10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00
[8]   Privacy and Social Implications of Distinct Sensing Approaches to Implementing Smart Homes for Older Adults [J].
Demiris, George .
2009 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-20, 2009, :4311-4314
[9]  
Eurobarometer, 2015, SPEC EUR 427 AUT SYS, DOI [10.2759/413916, DOI 10.2759/413916]
[10]   Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support [J].
Harris, Paul A. ;
Taylor, Robert ;
Thielke, Robert ;
Payne, Jonathon ;
Gonzalez, Nathaniel ;
Conde, Jose G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) :377-381