Evaluation of the radiological risk in cargo scanning by comparison with known biological consequences

被引:2
作者
Pelegrineli, S. Q. [1 ,2 ]
Silva, A. X. [1 ]
Filho, W. S. S. [3 ]
Oliveira, L. S. R. [4 ]
Stenders, R. M. [6 ]
Junior, J. P. R. [2 ]
Pereira, W. S. [1 ]
de Andrade, E. Ramos [5 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Rio de Janeiro UFRJ, Nucl Engn Grad Program, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Fac Bezerra Araujo FABA, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Fed Inst Educ Sci & Technol Piaui IFPI, Teresina, Brazil
[4] Inst Chem Biol Radiol & Nucl Def IDQBRN, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Mil Inst Engn IME, Def Engn Grad Program, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[6] Fundacao Armando Alvares Penteado FAAP, Sch Econ, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
scanner; cargo inspection; radiological protection; LEUKEMIA;
D O I
10.1051/radiopro/2021036
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study proposes a quick, easy, and low-cost method that can be used to assess the radiological safety of an irradiation line used for cargo and container inspection facilities. The radiation-emitting equipment used was a Smiths Heimam particle accelerator model HCVP4029 operating at 4.5 MeV. The radiation dose measurements were performed using a personal radiation monitor Ultra Radac mod MRAD 111 (Geiger-Muller). The ambient equivalent dose H*(10) was estimated for two facilities: A (real) (1.12E-03 mSv per scan) and B (fictitious) (3.25E-03 mSv per scan). The dimensionless factor R, which represents a ratio between two specific scanning (Ss) quantities regarding the facilities A and B, is introduced as a reference for assessing the level of radiological safety. This study compares facilities A and B by using a simple alternative safety assessment based on the R factor. The dimensionless R-value appears to be able to facilitate both the personnel's and the general public's perception of risk levels, even with no fixed scale.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 70
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 151 NCRP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Ann ICRP, V37, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003, DOI 10.1016/J.ICRP.2007.10.003]
[3]  
Choy LT., 2014, Journal of Humanities and Social Science, V19, P99, DOI DOI 10.9790/0837-194399104
[4]   Radiation-induced leukemia: Lessons from history [J].
Finch, Stuart C. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 2007, 20 (01) :109-118
[5]   MCNPX computational modeling applied to the potential dose rates calculation of cargo scanning [J].
Gomes, Renato G. ;
Braga, Kelmo L. ;
Mederios, Marcos P. C. ;
Stenders, Ricardo M. ;
Correa, Samanda C. A. ;
Rebello, Wilson F. ;
Silva, Ademir X. ;
Andrade, Edson R. .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2021, 178
[6]   Leukemia following the Chernobyl accident [J].
Howe, Geoffrey R. .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2007, 93 (05) :512-515
[7]   X-ray security scanners for personnel and vehicle control: Dose quantities and dose values [J].
Hupe, Oliver ;
Ankerhold, Ulrike .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 63 (02) :237-241
[8]  
Lopes J., 2019, RADIAT PHYS CHEM, V167
[9]   Committed effective dose and lifetime cancer risk due to ingestion of natural radionuclides in grains grown in an area of high background radiation [J].
Silva, Leandro B. ;
Lopes, Jose M. ;
Pereira, Wagner S. ;
Garcez, Ricardo W. D. ;
Silva, Ademir X. ;
Talhofer, Jardel L. .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2021, 172
[10]  
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), 2017, Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2017 Report to the General Assembly. Scientific Annex B. Epidemiological Studies of Cancer Risk Due to Low-Dose-Rate Radiation from Environmental Sources, P65