Counterfactual Impact Evaluation on EU Cohesion Policy Interventions in Training in Companies

被引:0
作者
Potluka, Oto [1 ]
Bruha, Jan [1 ]
Spacek, Martin [2 ,3 ]
Vrbova, Lucie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ Prague, Fac Business Adm, Dept Management, W Churchill Sqr 4, Prague 13067, Czech Republic
[2] Slovak Univ Technol Bratislava, SPECTRA Ctr Excellence, EU, Vazovova 5, Bratislava 81243 1, Slovakia
[3] Comenius Univ, Fac Management, Vazovova 5, Bratislava 81243 1, Slovakia
来源
EKONOMICKY CASOPIS | 2016年 / 64卷 / 06期
关键词
counterfactual impact evaluation; cohesion policy; training; European Social Fund; employment; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; SUBSIDIES; EMPLOYMENT; EMPLOYERS; MODELS; STATES; UK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An evaluation culture in the EU Cohesion Policy is developing. It applies a more rigorous approach than few years ago. Although the European Commission is introducing a requirement for impact evaluations, such evaluations are still rare. Employment is one of the core objectives of EU policies. Application of the counterfactual impact evaluation on the EU Cohesion Policy enables the inquiry into how one of the most important EU policies operates. The analysis comprises a sample of 373 supported and 202 rejected applicants. The appraisal experts' approach to applications is used as an instrumental variable to estimate the impacts of the assistance from the European Social Fund in Czech companies through interventions aimed at training of employees. The results indicate positive effects of the European Social Fund's assistance in companies even one year after the support ended. The estimates vary between 3 838 and 5 513 created or saved jobs.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 595
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Providing Employers with Incentives to Train Low-Skilled Workers: Evidence from the UK Employer Training Pilots [J].
Abramovsky, Laura ;
Battistin, Erich ;
Fitzsimons, Emla ;
Goodman, Alissa ;
Simpson, Helen .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2011, 29 (01) :153-193
[2]   Does Firm Size make a Difference? Analysing the Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies in East Germany [J].
Alecke, Bjoern ;
Mitze, Timo ;
Reinkowski, Janina ;
Untiedt, Gerhard .
GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 13 (02) :174-195
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COUNTERFACTUAL IMPAC
[4]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD BUSINESS REV
[5]   Local versus regime convergence regression models: a comparison of two approaches [J].
Artelaris P. .
GeoJournal, 2015, 80 (02) :263-277
[6]  
ASVAPP, 2012, COUNT IMP COH POL IM
[7]   Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Role of Finance, Governance, and Competition [J].
Ayyagari, Meghana ;
Demirguec-Kunt, Asli ;
Maksimovic, Vojislav .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2011, 46 (06) :1545-1580
[8]   Testing for programme effects in a regression discontinuity design with imperfect compliance [J].
Battistin, E ;
Rettore, E .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2002, 165 :39-57
[9]  
Battistin E., 2001, Econometric evaluation of active labour market policies
[10]   Which firms use targeted wage subsidies? An empirical note for Germany [J].
Bellmann, Lutz ;
Stephan, Gesine .
JOURNAL FOR LABOUR MARKET RESEARCH, 2014, 47 (1-2) :165-175