Effect of Quality Characteristics of Peer Raters on Rating Errors in Peer Assessment

被引:3
|
作者
Guo, Xiuyan [1 ]
Lei, Pui-Wa [2 ]
机构
[1] Emory & Henry Coll, Off Inst Res & Inst Effectiveness, Wiley 110, Emory, VA 24327 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Educ Psychol Counseling & Special Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
peer assessment; rater quality characteristics; rating errors; METAANALYSIS COMPARING PEER; ACCURACY; SELF;
D O I
10.1080/15305058.2020.1720216
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Little research has been done on the effects of peer raters' quality characteristics on peer rating qualities. This study aims to address this gap and investigate the effects of key variables related to peer raters' qualities, including content knowledge, previous rating experience, training on rating tasks, and rating motivation. In an experiment where training and motivation interventions were manipulated, 24 classes with 838 high school students were randomly assigned to study conditions. Inter-rater error, intra-rater error and criterion error indices for peer ratings on four selected essays were analyzed using hierarchical linear models. Results indicated that peer raters' content knowledge, previous rating experience, and rating motivation were associated with rating errors. This study also found some significant interactions between peer raters' quality characteristics. Implications for in-person and online peer assessments as well as future directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 230
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Peer-to-peer rating
    Bickson, Danny
    Malkhi, Dahlia
    Zhou, Lidong
    P2P: SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PEER-TO-PEER COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 211 - +
  • [2] Peer overmarking and insufficient diagnosticity: the impact of the rating method for peer assessment
    Van Meenen, Florence
    Coertjens, Liesje
    Van Nes, Marie-Claire
    Verschuren, Franck
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2022, 27 (04) : 1049 - 1066
  • [3] Peer overmarking and insufficient diagnosticity: the impact of the rating method for peer assessment
    Florence Van Meenen
    Liesje Coertjens
    Marie-Claire Van Nes
    Franck Verschuren
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2022, 27 : 1049 - 1066
  • [4] Peer assessment of class participation: applying peer nomination to overcome rating inflation
    Heyman, James E.
    Sailors, John J.
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (05) : 605 - 618
  • [5] A PEER ASSESSMENT RATING FOR PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY (PARPD)
    CRAWFORD, PJM
    BABB, DC
    HARVEY, IM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 856 - 856
  • [6] PEER RATING FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF ADJUSTMENT IN CHILDREN
    GHOSH, ESK
    SINHA, D
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 46 : 289 - &
  • [7] Assessment of the economic impact of forecasting errors in Peer-to-Peer energy trading
    Zhang, Bidan
    He, Guannan
    Du, Yang
    Wen, Haoran
    Huan, Xintao
    Xing, Bowen
    Huang, Jingsi
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 374
  • [8] Students' learning outcomes and peer rating accuracy in compulsory and voluntary online peer assessment
    Liu, Jin
    Guo, Xiuyan
    Gao, Ruiqin
    Fram, Paul
    Ling, Yu
    Zhang, He
    Wang, Jin
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (06) : 835 - 847
  • [9] PEER - A PEER RATING AND SOCIOMETRIC DATA ANALYZER
    STOLOFF, PH
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1969, 14 (03): : 253 - &
  • [10] RELIABILITY OF RATERS - THE EFFECTS OF RATING ERRORS ON THE SPEECH RATING PROCESS
    BOHN, CA
    BOHN, E
    COMMUNICATION EDUCATION, 1985, 34 (04) : 343 - 351