Amino acid network and its scoring application in protein-protein docking

被引:21
|
作者
Chang, Shan [1 ]
Jiao, Xiong [1 ]
Li, Chun-hua [1 ]
Gong, Xin-qi [1 ]
Chen, Wei-zu [1 ]
Wang, Cun-xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Life Sci & Bioengn, Beijing 100022, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金;
关键词
hydrophobic; hydrophilic; amino acid network; scoring function;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpc.2007.12.005
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein-protein complex, composed of hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues, can be divided into hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acid network structures respectively. In this paper, we are interested in analyzing these two different types of networks and find that these networks are of small-world properties. Due to the characteristic complementarity of the complex interfaces, protein-protein docking can be viewed as a particular network rewiring. These networks of correct docked complex conformations have much more increase of the degree values and decay of the clustering coefficients than those of the incorrect ones. Therefore, two scoring terms based on the network parameters are proposed, in which the geometric complementarity, hydrophobic-hydrophobic and polar-polar interactions are taken into account. Compared with a two-term energy function, a simple scoring function HPNet which includes the two network-based scoring terms shows advantages in two aspects, not relying on energy considerations and better discrimination. Furthermore, combing the network-based scoring terms with some other energy terms, a new multi-term scoring function HPNet-combine can also make some improvements to the scoring function of RosettaDock. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 118
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Collective variable driven molecular dynamics to improve protein-protein docking scoring
    Masone, Diego
    Grosdidier, Solene
    COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2014, 49 : 1 - 6
  • [22] Introducing a Clustering Step in a Consensus Approach for the Scoring of Protein-Protein Docking Models
    Chermak, Edrisse
    De Donato, Renato
    Lensink, Marc F.
    Petta, Andrea
    Serra, Luigi
    Scarano, Vittorio
    Cavallo, Luigi
    Oliva, Romina
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):
  • [23] Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking
    Camacho, CJ
    Gatchell, DW
    Kimura, SR
    Vajda, S
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2000, 40 (03) : 525 - 537
  • [24] Protein-protein docking with binding site patch prediction and network-based terms enhanced combinatorial scoring
    Gong, Xinqi
    Wang, Panwen
    Yang, Feng
    Chang, Shan
    Liu, Bin
    He, Hongqiu
    Cao, Libin
    Xu, Xianjin
    Li, Chunhua
    Chen, Weizu
    Wang, Cunxin
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 78 (15) : 3150 - 3155
  • [25] A protein-protein docking benchmark
    Chen, R
    Mintseris, J
    Janin, J
    Weng, ZP
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01): : 88 - 91
  • [26] ELECTROSTATICS IN PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING
    Eisenstein, M.
    Heifetz, A.
    Katchalski-Katzir, E.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 1999, 55 : 96 - 96
  • [27] A CONTINUUM MODEL FOR PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS - APPLICATION TO THE DOCKING PROBLEM
    JACKSON, RM
    STERNBERG, MJE
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 250 (02) : 258 - 275
  • [28] Electrostatics in protein-protein docking
    Heifetz, A
    Katchalski-Katzir, E
    Eisenstein, M
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (03) : 571 - 587
  • [29] Flexible protein-protein docking
    Bonvin, AM
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) : 194 - 200
  • [30] Performance and Its Limits in Rigid Body Protein-Protein Docking
    Desta, Israel T.
    Porter, Kathryn A.
    Xia, Bing
    Kozakov, Dima
    Vajda, Sandor
    STRUCTURE, 2020, 28 (09) : 1071 - +