A systematic review of dyadic studies examining relationship quality in couples facing colorectal cancer together

被引:61
作者
Kayser, Karen [1 ]
Acquati, Chiara [2 ]
Reese, Jennifer Barsky [3 ]
Mark, Kristen [4 ]
Wittmann, Daniela [5 ]
Karam, Eli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Oppenheimer Hall, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Grad Coll Social Work, Houston, TX USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Canc Prevent & Control Program, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Promot, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Taubman Ctr, Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
cancer; colorectal; couples; dyadic studies; oncology; systematic review; OF-LIFE; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; PROSTATE-CANCER; INTERVENTION; INTIMACY; POPULATION; DIAGNOSIS; GENDER; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1002/pon.4339
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundDespite the adverse effects that treatment for colorectal cancer can have on patients' quality of life and, in particular, their intimate relationships, very little research has been conducted on the psychosocial adjustment for both patients and their partners/spouses. ObjectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to examine dyadic studies of adjustment in couples in which one partner has been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. MethodsPub Med, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Social Sciences Abstracts (EBSCO), and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies reporting quality of life outcomes for colorectal cancer patients and their partners/spouses. Only studies that included dyads in the sample were eligible for inclusion. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to evaluate each study. ResultsA total of 277 studies were identified, of which 9 studies met the inclusion criteria (N=388 couples). The methodological quality of the studies was high in that they used standardized instruments validated with their samples, conducted dyadic data analyses (when appropriate), and used longitudinal designs. A synthesis of the studies revealed that (1) relationship factors (eg, support, communication, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction) affect adjustment to cancer; (2) cancer-related distress impacts each partner's adjustment or the relationship; and (3) gender, role (patient/caregiver), and clinical characteristics (treatment, mental health) can mediate adjustment to cancer. ConclusionThe quality of the relationship can influence patients' and their partners' adjustment to colorectal cancer. Psychosocial interventions that address relationship issues may be beneficial to couples facing the challenges of colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Examining quality time as a mediator of dyadic change in a randomized controlled trial of relationship education for low-income couples
    Carlson, Ryan G.
    Barden, Sejal M.
    Locklear, Lauren
    Taylor, Dalena Dillman
    Carroll, Nakita
    JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY, 2022, 48 (02) : 484 - 501
  • [32] Colorectal cancer survivorship: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
    Lim, Chloe Yi Shing
    Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah Clare
    Young, Jane M.
    Kao, Steven Chuan-Hao
    Zhang, Yuehan
    Butow, Phyllis
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2021, 30 (04)
  • [33] Influential factors of spousal relationship quality in couples living with dementia - A narrative synthesis systematic review
    Stedje, Kristi
    Kvamme, Tone K. S.
    Johansson, Kjersti
    Stensaeth, Karette A.
    Odell-Miller, Helen
    Bukowska, Anna
    Tamplin, Jeanette
    Baker, Felicity A.
    Wosch, Thomas
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 22 (01): : 281 - 302
  • [34] Relevance of Positive Dyadic Coping for Couples Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Treatments: A Systematic Review
    Santamaria-Gutiez, Rebeca
    Martinez-Corredor, Silvia
    Gonzalez-Sala, Francisco
    Lacomba-Trejo, Laura
    JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY, 2025, 51 (02)
  • [35] Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patient-Caregiver Dyads A Systematic Review
    Sterba, Katherine Regan
    Zapka, Jane
    Cranos, Caroline
    Laursen, Ashley
    Day, Terry A.
    CANCER NURSING, 2016, 39 (03) : 238 - 250
  • [37] A systematic review and thematic synthesis of quality of life in the informal carers of cancer patients with cachexia
    Wheelwright, Sally
    Darlington, Anne-Sophie
    Hopkinson, Jane B.
    Fitzsimmons, Deborah
    Johnson, Colin
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 30 (02) : 149 - 160
  • [38] Self-efficacy, psychological distress, and marital quality in young and middle-aged couples facing lymphoma: The mediating effect of dyadic coping
    An, Huiying
    Chen, Changying
    Du, Ruofei
    Cheng, Chunyan
    Wang, Panpan
    Dong, Shiqi
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 (09) : 1492 - 1501
  • [39] Relationship Dynamics among Couples Dealing with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Valente, Marco
    Chirico, Ilaria
    Ottoboni, Giovanni
    Chattat, Rabih
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)
  • [40] Are Mindfulness and Self-Compassion Related to Psychological Distress and Communication in Couples Facing Lung Cancer? A Dyadic Approach
    Schellekens, Melanie P. J.
    Karremans, Johan C.
    van der Drift, Miep A.
    Molema, Johan
    van den Hurk, Desiree G. M.
    Prins, Judith B.
    Speckens, Anne E. M.
    MINDFULNESS, 2017, 8 (02) : 325 - 336