A systematic review of dyadic studies examining relationship quality in couples facing colorectal cancer together

被引:64
作者
Kayser, Karen [1 ]
Acquati, Chiara [2 ]
Reese, Jennifer Barsky [3 ]
Mark, Kristen [4 ]
Wittmann, Daniela [5 ]
Karam, Eli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Oppenheimer Hall, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Grad Coll Social Work, Houston, TX USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Canc Prevent & Control Program, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Promot, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Taubman Ctr, Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
cancer; colorectal; couples; dyadic studies; oncology; systematic review; OF-LIFE; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; PROSTATE-CANCER; INTERVENTION; INTIMACY; POPULATION; DIAGNOSIS; GENDER; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1002/pon.4339
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundDespite the adverse effects that treatment for colorectal cancer can have on patients' quality of life and, in particular, their intimate relationships, very little research has been conducted on the psychosocial adjustment for both patients and their partners/spouses. ObjectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to examine dyadic studies of adjustment in couples in which one partner has been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. MethodsPub Med, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Social Sciences Abstracts (EBSCO), and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies reporting quality of life outcomes for colorectal cancer patients and their partners/spouses. Only studies that included dyads in the sample were eligible for inclusion. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to evaluate each study. ResultsA total of 277 studies were identified, of which 9 studies met the inclusion criteria (N=388 couples). The methodological quality of the studies was high in that they used standardized instruments validated with their samples, conducted dyadic data analyses (when appropriate), and used longitudinal designs. A synthesis of the studies revealed that (1) relationship factors (eg, support, communication, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction) affect adjustment to cancer; (2) cancer-related distress impacts each partner's adjustment or the relationship; and (3) gender, role (patient/caregiver), and clinical characteristics (treatment, mental health) can mediate adjustment to cancer. ConclusionThe quality of the relationship can influence patients' and their partners' adjustment to colorectal cancer. Psychosocial interventions that address relationship issues may be beneficial to couples facing the challenges of colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J CANC SURVIV
[2]  
[Anonymous], QUAL ASS TOOL QUANT
[3]   Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: A population-based study [J].
Arndt, V ;
Merx, H ;
Stegmaier, C ;
Ziegler, H ;
Brenner, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (23) :4829-4836
[4]   Restrictions in quality of life in colorectal cancer patients over three years after diagnosis: A population based study [J].
Arndt, Volker ;
Merx, Henrike ;
Stegmaier, Christa ;
Ziegler, Hartwig ;
Brenner, Hermann .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (12) :1848-1857
[5]   Addressing sexual dysfunction in colorectal cancer survivorship care [J].
Averyt, Jennifer C. ;
Nishimoto, Patricia W. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 5 (05) :388-394
[6]   Effects of relationship maintenance on psychological distress and dyadic adjustment among couples coping with lung cancer [J].
Badr, Hoda ;
Taylor, Cindy L. Carmack .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 27 (05) :616-627
[7]   A couple-based intervention for female breast cancer [J].
Baucom, Donald H. ;
Porter, Laura S. ;
Kirby, Jennifer S. ;
Gremore, Tina M. ;
Wiesenthal, Naomi ;
Aldridge, William ;
Fredman, Steffany J. ;
Stanton, Susan E. ;
Scott, Jennifer L. ;
Halford, Kim W. ;
Keefe, Francis J. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (03) :276-283
[8]   Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer [J].
Berg, Cynthia A. ;
Wiebe, Deborah J. ;
Butner, Jonathan ;
Bloor, Lindsey ;
Bradstreet, Chester ;
Upchurch, Renn ;
Hayes, John ;
Stephenson, Robert ;
Nail, Lillian ;
Patton, Gregory .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2008, 23 (03) :505-516
[9]   Body image as a predictor of psychopathology in surgical patients with colorectal disease [J].
Bullen, Tracey L. ;
Sharpe, Louise ;
Lawsin, Catalina ;
Patel, Deepa Chauhan ;
Clarke, Stephen ;
Bokey, Les .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2012, 73 (06) :459-463
[10]   Impact of colorectal cancer on patient and family: Implications for care [J].
Cotrim, Hortense ;
Pereira, Graca .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2008, 12 (03) :217-226