A Physically Meaningful Level Set Method for Topology Optimization of Structures

被引:0
作者
Luo, Zhen [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Nong [1 ]
Wang, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Elect Mech & Mechatron Syst, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Digital Mfg Equipment & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES | 2012年 / 83卷 / 01期
关键词
Topology optimization; level set method; compactly supported radial basis functions (CSRBFs); nodal density interpolation; GEOMETRY; DESIGN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper aims to present a physically meaningful level set method for shape and topology optimization of structures. Compared to the conventional level set method which represents the design boundary as the zero level set, in this study the boundary is embedded into non-zero constant level sets of the level set function, to implicitly implement shape fidelity and topology changes in time via the propagation of the discrete level set function. A point-wise nodal density field, non-negative and value-bounded, is used to parameterize the level set function via the compactly supported radial basis functions (CSRBFs) at a uniformly defined set of knots. The set of densities are used to interpolate practical material properties in finite element approximation via the standard Lagrangian shape function. CSRBFs knots are supposed to be consistent with finite element nodes only for the sake of numerical simplicity. By doing so, the discrete values of the level set function are assigned with practical material properties via the physically meaningful interpolation. The original more difficult shape and topology optimization of the Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equations (PDEs) is transformed to a relatively easier size optimization of the nodal densities, to which more efficient optimization algorithms can be directly applied. In this way, the dynamic motion of the design boundary is just a question of transporting the discrete level set function until the optimal criteria of the structure is satisfied. Two widely studied examples are applied to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 96
页数:24
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method [J].
Allaire, G ;
Jouve, F ;
Toader, AM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2004, 194 (01) :363-393
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Applied Mathematical Sciences
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, COMPUTER METHODS APP, DOI DOI 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90046-9
[6]   Topology optimization with implicit functions and regularization [J].
Belytschko, T ;
Xiao, SP ;
Parimi, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2003, 57 (08) :1177-1196
[7]   GENERATING OPTIMAL TOPOLOGIES IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING A HOMOGENIZATION METHOD [J].
BENDSOE, MP ;
KIKUCHI, N .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1988, 71 (02) :197-224
[8]   Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization [J].
Bendsoe, MP ;
Sigmund, O .
ARCHIVE OF APPLIED MECHANICS, 1999, 69 (9-10) :635-654
[9]  
Buhmann M, 2004, Cambridge monographs on applied and computational mathematics
[10]  
Choi K.K., 2005, STRUCTURAL SENSITIVI