Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations

被引:0
作者
Tomasi, C. [1 ]
Bressan, E. [2 ]
Corazza, B. [2 ]
Mazzoleni, S. [2 ]
Stellini, E. [2 ]
Lith, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Odontol, Dept Periodontol, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Padua, Sch Dent, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Odontol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
cone beam computed tomography; image reconstruction; reliability of results; DIGITAL VOLUME TOMOGRAPHY; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; MAXILLARY CANINES; FILM RADIOGRAPHY; PROXIMAL CARIES; REFORMATTED CT; DENTAL USE; ACCURACY; DEVICE; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr/17432330
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of inclination of the object on the reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of anatomic structures of the mandible on images obtained using cone-beam CT (CBCT). Methods: Ten linear dimensions between anatomical landmarks were measured in a dry mandible. The measurements were performed with a manual calliper three times by three observers. The mandible was scanned with Planmeca Promax 3D cone-beam CT (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) with the base of the mandible parallel as well as tilted 45 degrees to the horizontal plane. Computer measurements of the linear dimension were performed by three observers. The radiographic measurements were performed four times for each experimental setting. A total of 240 measurements were performed. Reproducibility was evaluated through comparison of standard deviation (SD) and estimation of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The error was estimated as the absolute difference between the radiographic measurements and the mean manual calliper measurements. Results: The mean SD for the radiographic measurements was 0.36 mm for the horizontally positioned mandible and 0.48 mm for the inclined mandible. The ICC between examiners was 0.996 mm, between sessions was 0.990 mm and between CBCT measurements and calliper was 0.992 mm. The overall absolute mean measurement error was 0.40 mm (SD 0.39 mm). The percentage of errors that exceeded 1 mm was 6.7%. Conclusion: The results revealed high reliability of measurements performed on CBCT images independently from object position, examiner's experience and high reproducibility in repeated measurements settings. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2011) 40, 244-250. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17432330
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 250
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Accuracy of proximal caries depth measurements:: Comparison between limited cone beam computed tomography, storage phosphor and film radiography
    Akdeniz, B. Guniz
    Grondahl, Hans-Goran
    Magnusson, Bengt
    [J]. CARIES RESEARCH, 2006, 40 (03) : 202 - 207
  • [2] Measurement error and correlation coefficients
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7048) : 41 - 42
  • [3] Accuracy of reformatted CT image for measuring the pre-implant site: Analysis of the image distortion related to the gantry angle change
    Choi, SC
    Ann, CH
    Choi, HM
    Heo, MS
    Lee, SS
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (04) : 273 - 277
  • [4] Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry
    Frei, C
    Buser, D
    Dula, K
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (04) : 490 - 497
  • [5] State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement
    Guerrero, ME
    Jacobs, R
    Loubele, M
    Schutyser, F
    Suetens, P
    van Steenberghe, D
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2006, 10 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [6] Gupta R, 2004, AM J NEURORADIOL, V25, P1417
  • [7] Hashimoto Koji, 2006, J Oral Sci, V48, P27, DOI 10.2334/josnusd.48.27
  • [8] Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position
    Hassan, Bassam
    van der Stelt, Paul
    Sanderink, Gerard
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 31 (02) : 129 - 134
  • [9] Kim KD, 2003, INT J PERIODONT REST, V23, P177
  • [10] Kobayashi K, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P228