The effect of different combinations of fixatives and decalcifying agents on rat and rabbit hard tissues, a guide for histologic processing

被引:3
作者
Alaeddini, Mojgan [1 ]
Bashizadehfakhar, Hoorieh [2 ]
Amirinia, Fatemeh [1 ]
Abbasi, Shima
Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza [3 ,4 ]
Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo [1 ,7 ]
Dehpour, Ahmadreza [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dent Res Inst, Dent Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dent Res Inst, Res Ctr Caries Prevent, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Community Oral Hlth, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, Tehran, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Expt Med Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[7] Dent Res Ctr, Dent Res Inst, Ghods St,Enghelab Ave,POB 14155-5583, Tehran 14174, Iran
关键词
Acid decalcification; EDTA decalcification; Fixatives; Histologic quality; Rats; Rabbits; ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT; DECALCIFICATION; BONE; DNA;
D O I
10.1016/j.acthis.2022.151962
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: In order to acquire the best method that can simultaneously maximize tissue morphology and staining quality, we compared the effect of different fixative and decalcifying solutions on the quality of rabbit and rat bone histology. Method: Fifty-four rat hemimaxillae and 54 rabbit quarter-parietal bones were allocated into 3 fixation groups (formalin, 10 %sodium-phosphate-buffered-formalin and 10 %calcium-phosphate-buffered-formalin). Each fixative was divided into 6 groups and decalcified with 5 % and 10 % nitric acid (NA), 5 % and 10 % formic acid (FA), Gooding-Stewart liquid (GSL) and EDTA. Slide quality was evaluated on hematoxylin/eosin slides by 3 observers and mean-scores for total-cell-characteristics (TCC) and total-tissue-characteristics (TTC) were statis-tically analyzed. Result: Significant differences in decalcification-time were observed in different combinations of decalcifiers and fixatives in both animals. In rats, TCC was better preserved when using 10 %NA/calcium-phosphate-buffered-formalin compared to 10 %NA/sodium-phosphate-buffered-formalin (P = 0.03). GSL/sodium-phosphate-buffered-formalin performed better than both other fixatives (P < 0.001). TCC differed among the decalcifiers in each of the fixatives. In rabbits, there were differences in TCC among the decalcifiers when formalin (P = 0.001) and sodium-phosphate-buffered-formalin (P = 0.01) were used. TTC only showed significant difference when 10 %FA was used in rats (P = 0.044), with formalin performing better than sodium-phosphate-buffered-formalin (P = 0.01). Conclusion: Based on our results, if time is an issue, 10 %NA/calcium-phosphate-buffered-formalin could provide good cellular quality and if time is not a consideration, FA (5 % or 10 %) with sodium-phosphate-buffered-formalin followed by EDTA with formalin, would have the best performance. In rabbits, GSL provides the fastest results, regardless of the fixative and FA/sodium-phosphate-buffered-formalin gives the best cellular quality.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Effect of bone decalcification procedures on DNA in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization: EDTA is highly preferable to a routinely used acid decalcifier
    Alers, JC
    Krijtenburg, PJ
    Vissers, KJ
    van Dekken, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 47 (05) : 703 - 709
  • [2] EFFECT OF DECALCIFICATION AGENTS ON IMMUNOREACTIVITY OF CELLULAR ANTIGENS
    ATHANASOU, NA
    QUINN, J
    HERYET, A
    WOODS, CG
    MCGEE, JO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1987, 40 (08) : 874 - 878
  • [3] Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions
    Bogoevski, Kristofor
    Woloszyk, Anna
    Blackwood, Keith
    Woodruff, Maria A.
    Glatt, Vaida
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 67 (08) : 545 - 561
  • [4] Routine acid decalcification of bone marrow samples can preserve DNA for FISH and CGH studies in metastatic prostate cancer
    Brown, RSD
    Edwards, J
    Bartlett, JW
    Jones, C
    Dogan, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 50 (01) : 113 - 115
  • [5] Callis G, 1998, J HISTOTECHNOL, V21, P49
  • [6] Advantages of a Combined Method of Decalcification Compared to EDTA
    Castania, Vitor Aparecido
    de Souza da Silveira, Joao Walter
    Issy, Ana Carolina
    Pitol, Dimitrius Leonardo
    Castania, Mayara Leite
    Dorigan Neto, Abel
    Del Bel, Elaine Aparecida
    Aparecido Defino, Helton Luiz
    [J]. MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2015, 78 (02) : 111 - 118
  • [7] Comparison of decalcifying agents and techniques for human dental tissues
    Choube, A.
    Astekar, M.
    Choube, A.
    Sapra, G.
    Agarwal, A.
    Rana, A.
    [J]. BIOTECHNIC & HISTOCHEMISTRY, 2018, 93 (02) : 99 - 108
  • [8] Application of ultrasound accelerates the decalcification process of bone matrix without affecting histological and immunohistochemical analysis
    Chow, Dick H.
    Zheng, Lizhen
    Tian, Li
    Ho, Kam-Sing
    Qin, Ling
    Guo, Xia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2019, 17 : 112 - 120
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DECALCIFYING BONE
    COOK, SF
    EZRACOHN, HE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1962, 10 (05) : 560 - &
  • [10] Ellis R.C., 2002, PROBLEMS HISTOPATHOL