Decision Analysis and CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery Development Strategies

被引:8
作者
Attanasi, E. D. [1 ]
Freeman, P. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr,Mail Stop 954, Reston, VA 20192 USA
关键词
Asset value; CO2-enhanced oil recovery; CO2 subsurface storage; Injected fluids; STORAGE; INJECTION; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11053-021-09983-6
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the relationship between actual reservoir conditions and predicted measures of performance of carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) programs. It then shows how CO2-EOR operators might maximize the value of their projects by approaching implementation using a "flexible selective" pattern development strategy, where the CO2-EOR program patterns are selectively developed based on site-specific reservoir properties. It also analyzes performance measures and economic consequences of utilizing a continuous CO2 injection strategy intended to maximize CO2 retention for a defined time period. "Net CO2 utilization," calculated as difference between the volumes of CO2 injected and CO2 recovered in the production stream divided by the oil produced, is a standard measure of CO2-EOR carbon utilization, but it can be a misleading predictor of the actual CO2 retained in the reservoir. Asset value can be added to a CO2-EOR project by recognizing effects of variations in reservoir parameter values and basing incremental development decisions on those data. For policy analysts, the consequences of ignoring geologic variability within a reservoir that is a candidate for CO2-EOR will likely be to substantially overestimate predicted adoption of CO2-EOR in response to economic incentives. This result holds true whether the CO2-EOR program objective is to maximize net value by maximizing oil production or maximize CO2 storage with oil recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 749
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Advanced Resources International Inc., 2006, BAS OR STRAT CO 2 EN
[2]   Estimating the pressure-limited dynamic capacity and costs of basin-scale CO2 storage in a saline formation [J].
Anderson, Steven T. ;
Jahediesfanjani, Hossein .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2019, 88 :156-167
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Enhanced Oil Recovery
[4]  
Cook BenjaminR., 2012, Wyoming's Miscible CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Potential from Main Pay Zones: An Economic Scoping Study
[5]  
Dobitz J.K., 1994, STEAM TUB MOD PC SPE
[6]  
Dykstra H., 1950, Secondary Recovery of Oil in the United States, V2, P160
[7]   CO2-EOR and storage design optimization [J].
Ettehadtavakkol, Amin ;
Lake, Larry W. ;
Bryant, Steven L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 25 :79-92
[8]  
Ghahfarokhi R.B., 2016, SPE IMPROVED OIL REC, DOI [10.2118/179569-MS, DOI 10.2118/179569-MS]
[9]  
Green D.W., 1998, Enhanced Oil Recovery
[10]  
Hirasaki G.J., 1984, SPE13415MS