Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models: validation against clamp

被引:93
作者
Dalla Man, C
Yarasheski, KE
Caumo, A
Robertson, H
Toffolo, G
Polonsky, KS
Cobelli, C
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Informat Engn, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Endocrinol Metab & Lipid Res, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM | 2005年 / 289卷 / 06期
关键词
insulin resistance; oral glucose tolerance test; meal; insulin action; tracer kinetics;
D O I
10.1152/ajpendo.00076.2005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Measuring insulin sensitivity in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, e. g., during a meal or OGTT, is important to better understand insulin resistance in a variety of metabolic conditions. Recently, two oral minimal models have been proposed to measure overall insulin sensitivity (S-I) and its selective effect on glucose disposal (S-I(*)) from oral tests. S-I and S-I(*) have been successfully validated against multiple tracer meal estimates, but validation against euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp estimates is lacking. Here, we do so in 21 subjects who underwent both a multiple-tracer OGTT and a labeled euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Correlation between minimal-model S-I, S-I(*) and corresponding clamp estimates S-I(*clamp), S-I(*clamp) was satisfactory, respectively r = 0.81, P < 0.001, and r = 0.71, P < 0.001. SI was significantly lower than S I clamp (8.08 +/- 0.89 vs. 13.66 +/- 1.69 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1) per mu U/ml, P = 0.0002), whereas S-I(*) and S-I(*clamp) were very similar (8.17 +/- 1.59 vs. 8.84 +/- 1.39 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1) per mu U/ml, P = 0.52). These results add credibility to the oral minimal-model method as a simple and reliable physiological tool to estimate S-I and S-I(*), also in large-scale clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:E954 / E959
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   SAAM II: Simulation, Analysis, and Modeling Software for tracer and pharmacokinetic studies [J].
Barrett, PHR ;
Bell, BM ;
Cobelli, C ;
Golde, H ;
Schumitzky, A ;
Vicini, P ;
Foster, DM .
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1998, 47 (04) :484-492
[2]   Use of a novel triple-tracer approach to assess postprandial glucose metabolism [J].
Basu, R ;
Di Camillo, B ;
Toffolo, G ;
Basu, A ;
Shah, P ;
Vella, A ;
Rizza, R ;
Cobelli, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2003, 284 (01) :E55-E69
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY INVIVO [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
FINEGOOD, DT ;
ADER, M .
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 1985, 6 (01) :45-86
[4]   QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
IDER, YZ ;
BOWDEN, CR ;
COBELLI, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 236 (06) :E667-E677
[5]   PHYSIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF FACTORS CONTROLLING GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE IN MAN - MEASUREMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY AND BETA-CELL GLUCOSE SENSITIVITY FROM THE RESPONSE TO INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
PHILLIPS, LS ;
COBELLI, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1981, 68 (06) :1456-1467
[6]   TRANSMEMBRANE GLUCOSE-TRANSPORT IN SKELETAL-MUSCLE OF PATIENTS WITH NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES [J].
BONADONNA, RC ;
DELPRATO, S ;
SACCOMANI, MP ;
BONORA, E ;
GULLI, G ;
FERRANNINI, E ;
BIER, D ;
COBELLI, C ;
DEFRONZO, RA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1993, 92 (01) :486-494
[7]   Oral glucose tolerance test minimal model indexes of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity [J].
Breda, E ;
Cavaghan, MK ;
Toffolo, G ;
Polonsky, KS ;
Cobelli, C .
DIABETES, 2001, 50 (01) :150-158
[8]  
Carson ER., 1983, MATH MODELING ENDOCR
[9]   Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: insights from a two-compartment model [J].
Caumo, A ;
Vicini, P ;
Zachwieja, JJ ;
Avogaro, A ;
Yarasheski, K ;
Bier, DM ;
Cobelli, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 1999, 276 (06) :E1171-E1193
[10]  
CAUMO A, 2001, TRACER EXPT DESIGN M