Insulin sensitivity by oral glucose minimal models: validation against clamp

被引:93
作者
Dalla Man, C
Yarasheski, KE
Caumo, A
Robertson, H
Toffolo, G
Polonsky, KS
Cobelli, C
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Informat Engn, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Endocrinol Metab & Lipid Res, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM | 2005年 / 289卷 / 06期
关键词
insulin resistance; oral glucose tolerance test; meal; insulin action; tracer kinetics;
D O I
10.1152/ajpendo.00076.2005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Measuring insulin sensitivity in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, e. g., during a meal or OGTT, is important to better understand insulin resistance in a variety of metabolic conditions. Recently, two oral minimal models have been proposed to measure overall insulin sensitivity (S-I) and its selective effect on glucose disposal (S-I(*)) from oral tests. S-I and S-I(*) have been successfully validated against multiple tracer meal estimates, but validation against euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp estimates is lacking. Here, we do so in 21 subjects who underwent both a multiple-tracer OGTT and a labeled euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Correlation between minimal-model S-I, S-I(*) and corresponding clamp estimates S-I(*clamp), S-I(*clamp) was satisfactory, respectively r = 0.81, P < 0.001, and r = 0.71, P < 0.001. SI was significantly lower than S I clamp (8.08 +/- 0.89 vs. 13.66 +/- 1.69 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1) per mu U/ml, P = 0.0002), whereas S-I(*) and S-I(*clamp) were very similar (8.17 +/- 1.59 vs. 8.84 +/- 1.39 10(-4) dl.kg(-1).min(-1) per mu U/ml, P = 0.52). These results add credibility to the oral minimal-model method as a simple and reliable physiological tool to estimate S-I and S-I(*), also in large-scale clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:E954 / E959
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] SAAM II: Simulation, Analysis, and Modeling Software for tracer and pharmacokinetic studies
    Barrett, PHR
    Bell, BM
    Cobelli, C
    Golde, H
    Schumitzky, A
    Vicini, P
    Foster, DM
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1998, 47 (04): : 484 - 492
  • [2] Use of a novel triple-tracer approach to assess postprandial glucose metabolism
    Basu, R
    Di Camillo, B
    Toffolo, G
    Basu, A
    Shah, P
    Vella, A
    Rizza, R
    Cobelli, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2003, 284 (01): : E55 - E69
  • [3] ASSESSMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY INVIVO
    BERGMAN, RN
    FINEGOOD, DT
    ADER, M
    [J]. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 1985, 6 (01) : 45 - 86
  • [4] QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY
    BERGMAN, RN
    IDER, YZ
    BOWDEN, CR
    COBELLI, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 236 (06): : E667 - E677
  • [5] PHYSIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF FACTORS CONTROLLING GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE IN MAN - MEASUREMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY AND BETA-CELL GLUCOSE SENSITIVITY FROM THE RESPONSE TO INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE
    BERGMAN, RN
    PHILLIPS, LS
    COBELLI, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1981, 68 (06) : 1456 - 1467
  • [6] TRANSMEMBRANE GLUCOSE-TRANSPORT IN SKELETAL-MUSCLE OF PATIENTS WITH NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES
    BONADONNA, RC
    DELPRATO, S
    SACCOMANI, MP
    BONORA, E
    GULLI, G
    FERRANNINI, E
    BIER, D
    COBELLI, C
    DEFRONZO, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1993, 92 (01) : 486 - 494
  • [7] Oral glucose tolerance test minimal model indexes of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity
    Breda, E
    Cavaghan, MK
    Toffolo, G
    Polonsky, KS
    Cobelli, C
    [J]. DIABETES, 2001, 50 (01) : 150 - 158
  • [8] Carson ER., 1983, MATH MODELING ENDOCR
  • [9] Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: insights from a two-compartment model
    Caumo, A
    Vicini, P
    Zachwieja, JJ
    Avogaro, A
    Yarasheski, K
    Bier, DM
    Cobelli, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 1999, 276 (06): : E1171 - E1193
  • [10] CAUMO A, 2001, TRACER EXPT DESIGN M