Evaluating volatility forecasts in option pricing in the context of a simulated options market

被引:10
作者
Xekalaki, E
Degiannakis, S
机构
[1] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Dept Stat, Athens 10434, Greece
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dept Stat, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
ARCH models; forecast volatility; model selection; predictability; standardized prediction error citerion; option pricing;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2004.05.030
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The performance of an ARCH model selection algorithm based on the standardized prediction error criterion (SPEC) is evaluated. The evaluation of the algorithm is performed by comparing different volatility forecasts in option pricing through the simulation of an options market. Traders employing the SPEC model selection algorithm use the model with the lowest sum of squared standardized one-step-ahead prediction errors for obtaining their volatility forecast. The cumulative profits of the participants in pricing 1-day index straddle options always using variance forecasts obtained by GARCH, EGARCH and TARCH models are compared to those made by the participants using variance forecasts obtained by models suggested by the SPEC algorithm. The straddles are priced on the Standard and Poor 500 (S & P 500) index. It is concluded that traders, who base their selection of an ARCH model on the SPEC algorithm, achieve higher profits than those, who use only a single ARCH model. Moreover, the SPEC algorithm is compared with other criteria of model selection that measure the ability of the ARCH models to forecast the realized intra-day volatility. In this case too, the SPEC algorithm users achieve the highest returns. Thus, the SPEC model selection method appears to be a useful tool in selecting the appropriate model for estimating future volatility in pricing derivatives. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 629
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15, 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15]
[2]   The distribution of realized stock return volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Ebens, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 61 (01) :43-76
[3]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[4]   Modeling and forecasting realized volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (02) :579-625
[5]  
Andersen TG., 1999, Journal of Empirical Finance, V6, P457, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0927-5398(99)00013-4, 10.1016/S0927-5398(99)00013-4]
[6]  
ANDERSEN TG, 2004, IN PRESS HDB FINANCI
[7]  
Bera AK., 1993, J ECON SURV, V7, P305, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-6419.1993.TB00170.X
[8]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[9]  
Black F., 1976, P AM STAT ASS BUS EC, P177, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90024-6
[10]   Periodic autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity [J].
Bollerslev, T ;
Ghysels, E .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1996, 14 (02) :139-151