John Owen as proto-social trinitarian? Reinterpreting Owen and resisting a recent trend

被引:2
作者
Kieser, Ty [1 ]
机构
[1] Wheaton Coll, Wheaton, IL 60187 USA
关键词
appropriations; covenant of redemption; indivisible operations; John Owen; social trinitarianism; Trinity;
D O I
10.1017/S0036930621000399
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
Contrary to much of the recent literature on the trinitarian theology of John Owen, which often ascribes radical personal distinction to his account of triune relations and actions, this paper argues that Owen's account of distinct divine persons and trinitarian actions ought not to be contrasted with his theological forebears: Augustine, Thomas Aquinas and Calvin. Instead, his account of trinitarian ontology and operation is thoroughly consistent with (and dependent upon) the Augustinian principles that these interpreters suspect Owen is rejecting. The argument unfolds by presenting four putative points of strong personal distinction in John Owen's trinitarian theology and then reinterpreting each of the themes and passages that these four points are supposedly rooted in, evidencing his Augustinian account of trinitarian unity and distinction.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 234
页数:13
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], VINDICIAE EVANGELICA, V12, P73
  • [2] [Anonymous], WJO, V12, P496
  • [3] [Anonymous], NICENE POST NICENE F, V8, P23
  • [4] [Anonymous], SUMMA THEOLOGIAE
  • [5] [Anonymous], TRINITARIAN SPIRITUA, P36
  • [6] Augustine John E, 1991, TRINITY
  • [7] Ayres Lewis., 2010, AUGUSTINE TRINITY, P211
  • [8] Barnes MichelRene., 1995, Augustinian Studies, V26, P51
  • [9] Barth Karl., 1956, CHURCH DOGMATICS 4 1, P65
  • [10] Baylor Robert., 2019, TRINITY HIERARCHY RE, P173