Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
作者
Chen, Yiwen [1 ]
Feng, Jianhua [2 ]
Duan, Haifeng [1 ]
Yue, Youwei [2 ]
Zhang, Chaofeng [1 ]
Deng, Tuo [1 ]
Zeng, Guohua [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Minimally Invas Surg Ctr, Dept Urol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Longgang Dist Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
MORPHOMETRY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0206810
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery (OS) for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones based on published literatures. Materials and methods A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, CNKI and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing outcomes of PCNL and OS for treating patients with staghorn stones up to Jan 2018. Results There was no significant difference in final-SFR between PCNL and OS (odds ratio[OR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64, 2.15; p = 0.61), while PCNL provided a significantly lower immediate-SFR compared with OS (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51; P < 0.0001). PCNL provided significantly lower overall complication rate, shorter operative times, hospitalization times, less blood loss and blood transfusion compared with OS (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.84; P = 0.004), (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -59.01 mins; 95% CI: -81.09, -36.93; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -5.77 days; 95% CI: -7.80, -3.74; p < 0.00001), (WMD: -138.29 ml; 95% CI: -244.98, -31.6; p = 0.01) and (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.68; P = 0.00002), respectively. No significant differences were found in minor complications (Clavien I-II) (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.09; p = 0.12) and major complications (Clavien III-V) (OR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.08; P = 0.08). In subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences for overall complications and operative times between mini-PCNL and OS. In sensitivity analysis, there was no significant difference for overall complications between PCNL and OS. Conclusion Our analysis suggested that standard PCNL turns out to be a safe and feasible alternative for patients with staghorn stones compared to OS or mini-PCNL. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample, prospective, multi-centric and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Treatment of complete staghorn stones: A prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Al-Kohlany, KM ;
Shokeir, AA ;
Mosbah, A ;
Mohsen, T ;
Shoma, AM ;
Eraky, I ;
El-Kenawy, M ;
El-Kappany, HA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (02) :469-473
[2]   The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome [J].
Aminsharifi, Alireza ;
Irani, Dariush ;
Masoumi, Mansour ;
Goshtasbi, Bahman ;
Aminsharifi, Amirhossein ;
Mohamadian, Reza .
UROLITHIASIS, 2016, 44 (06) :551-557
[3]  
[Anonymous], CHIN J ENDOUROLOGY
[4]  
[Anonymous], UROTODAY INT J
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, BMJ, V343, pd5928, DOI [DOI 10.1136/BMJ.D5928, 10.1136/bmj.d5928]
[6]  
[Anonymous], MED RECAPITULATE
[7]  
[Anonymous], MODERN ONCOLOGY
[8]  
[Anonymous], CHINESE J MODERN OPE
[9]   Anatrophic nephrolithotomy [J].
Assimos, DG .
UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (01) :161-165
[10]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for treatment of staghorn stones in pediatric patients [J].
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. ;
Shokeir, Ahmed A. ;
Shoma, Ahmed M. ;
Eraky, Ibrahim ;
Sarhan, Osama M. ;
Hafez, Ashraf T. ;
Dawaba, Mohamed S. ;
Elshal, Ahmed M. ;
Ghali, Ahmed M. ;
El-Kenawy, Mahmoud R. .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (11-12) :E906-E909