Using a 'rich picture' to facilitate systems thinking in research coproduction

被引:33
作者
Conte, Kathleen P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Davidson, Seanna [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Australian Prevent Partnership Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Univ Ctr Rural Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Syst Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Systems thinking; soft systems methodology; quality improvement; coproduction; translation; health promotion; health information technology; HEALTH; IMPROVEMENT; COMPLEXITY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-019-0514-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In coproduction research, traditional 'end-users' are involved in the entire research process. The aim is to facilitate research translation by improving the timeliness and relevance of research. Because end-users often come from multiple sectors and hold diverse perspectives and priorities, involving them in coproduction can be challenging. Tools and approaches are needed to support coproduction teams to successfully navigate divergent viewpoints while producing rigorous but meaningful research outcomes. Rich pictures are a systems thinking tool to help make sense of complexity. In this paper, we describe how we developed and applied a 'rich picture' in a coproduction project with policy-level partners. Methods Guided by systems thinking principles, we conducted a systemic analysis of ethnographic fieldnotes collected as part of a broader study that examined the dynamics between an IT system and the implementation of the state-wide childhood obesity prevention programmes it was designed to monitor. Translating qualitative themes into metaphor and imagery, we created a visual depiction of the system to reflect the experience of the system's users (health promotion practitioners) and facilitated a workshop with policy-level programme administrators (i.e. participants, n = 7). Our aim was to increase the transparency of the system for our research partners and to spark new insights to improve the quality of programme implementation. Results Guided by provocative questions, participants discussed and challenged each other's thinking on the current functioning of the system. They identified future lines of inquiry to explore for quality improvement. Participants strongly agreed that the picture was a constructive way to engage with the ethnographic data but were challenged by the information and its implications. The opportunity for participants to co-learn from each other as well as from the picture was an added value. Conclusion In the context of the facilitated workshop, the rich picture enabled research partners to engage with complex research findings and gain new insights. Its value was harnessed via the guided participatory process. This demonstrates the importance that, in the future, such tools should be accompanied by practices that enable participants to think with and apply systems thinking concepts and principles.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, GOING EXTRA MILE IMP
[2]   Arts and Mixed Methods Research: An Innovative Methodological Merger [J].
Archibald, Mandy M. ;
Gerber, Nancy .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2018, 62 (07) :956-977
[3]   Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model [J].
Beckett, Kate ;
Farr, Michelle ;
Kothari, Anita ;
Wye, Lesley ;
le May, Andree .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
[4]   How People Use Rich Pictures to Help Them Think and Act [J].
Bell, Simon ;
Morse, Stephen .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2013, 26 (04) :331-348
[5]   How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement [J].
Boaz, Annette ;
Hanney, Stephen ;
Borst, Robert ;
O'Shea, Alison ;
Kok, Maarten .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
[6]   What to expect when you're evaluating healthcare improvement: a concordat approach to managing collaboration and uncomfortable realities [J].
Brewster, Liz ;
Aveling, Emma-Louise ;
Martin, Graham ;
Tarrant, Carolyn ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2015, 24 (05) :318-324
[7]   SOME ELEMENTS OF A SOCIOLOGY OF TRANSLATION - DOMESTICATION OF THE SCALLOPS AND THE FISHERMEN OF ST-BRIEUC BAY [J].
CALLON, M .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW MONOGRAPH, 1986, :196-233
[8]  
Canadian Institutes for Health Research, 2016, EV STRAT PAT OR RES
[9]   Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the field [J].
Carey, Gemma ;
Malbon, Eleanor ;
Carey, Nicole ;
Joyce, Andrew ;
Crammond, Brad ;
Carey, Alan .
BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (12)
[10]  
Checkland P, 2000, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V17, pS11, DOI 10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>3.0.CO