Bayesian calibration of building energy models with large datasets

被引:91
作者
Chong, Adrian [1 ]
Lam, Khee Poh [1 ,2 ]
Pozzi, Matteo [3 ]
Yang, Junjing [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Design & Environm, Dept Bldg, 4 Architecture Dr, Singapore 117566, Singapore
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Ctr Bldg Performance & Diagnost, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Building simulation; Bayesian calibration; Uncertainty analysis; Hamiltonian Monte Carlo; No-U-Turn Sampler; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS METHODS; SIMULATION-MODELS; MATCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.069
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Bayesian calibration as proposed by Kennedy and O'Hagan [22] has been increasingly applied to building energy models due to its ability to account for the discrepancy between observed values and model predictions. However, its application has been limited to calibration using monthly aggregated data because it is computationally inefficient when the dataset is large. This study focuses on improvements to the current implementation of Bayesian calibration to building energy simulation. This is achieved by: (1) using information theory to select a representative subset of the entire dataset for the calibration, and (2) using a more effective Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS), which is an extension of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) to explore the posterior distribution. The calibrated model was assessed by evaluating both accuracy and convergence. Application of the proposed method is demonstrated using two cases studies: (1) a TRNSYS model of a water-cooled chiller in a mixed-use building in Singapore, and (2) an EnergyPlus model of the cooling system of an office building in Pennsylvania, U.S.A. In both case studies, convergence was achieved for all parameters of the posterior distribution, with Gelman-Rubin statistics (R) over cap within 1 +/- 0.1. The coefficient of variation of the root mean squared error (CVRMSE) and normalized mean biased error (NMBE) were also within the thresholds set by ASHRAE Guideline 14 [1]. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 355
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Probabilistic inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, P 15 IBPSA C SAN FRA
[3]   A manifesto for the equifinality thesis [J].
Beven, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 320 (1-2) :18-36
[4]  
Biegler L., 2011, Large-Scale Inverse Problems and Quantification of Uncertainty, V712
[5]   An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models [J].
Campolongo, Francesca ;
Cariboni, Jessica ;
Saltelli, Andrea .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (10) :1509-1518
[6]  
CARROLL WL, 1993, ASHRAE TRAN, V99, P928
[7]   Evaluation of "Autotune" calibration against manual calibration of building energy models [J].
Chaudhary, Gaurav ;
New, Joshua ;
Sanyal, Jibonananda ;
Im, Piljae ;
O'Neill, Zheng ;
Garg, Vishal .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 182 :115-134
[8]  
Chong A., 2017, THESIS
[9]   A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data [J].
Coakley, Daniel ;
Raftery, Paul ;
Keane, Marcus .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 37 :123-141
[10]   HYBRID MONTE-CARLO [J].
DUANE, S ;
KENNEDY, AD ;
PENDLETON, BJ ;
ROWETH, D .
PHYSICS LETTERS B, 1987, 195 (02) :216-222