Effective radiation doses in neck computed tomography scans

被引:6
作者
Alzimami, Khalid [1 ]
Jambi, Layal [1 ]
Mattar, Essam [1 ]
Alenezi, Ahmed [1 ]
Alfuraih, Abdulrahman [1 ]
Salah, Hassan [2 ,3 ]
Rabbaa, Mohammad [4 ]
Abuljoud, Mohammad [4 ]
Alsafi, Khaled [5 ]
Alsubaie, Abdullah [6 ]
Sulieman, Abdelmoneim [7 ]
Bradley, David A. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Dept Radiol Sci, POB 10219, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia
[2] Nucl Med Dept, INAYA Med Collage, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Sudan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Med Radiol Sci, Khartoum, Sudan
[4] Riyadh Care Hosp, Radiol Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Phys Unit, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[6] Taif Univ, Coll Khurma, Dept Phys, POB 11099,, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
[7] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Radiol & Med Imaging Dept, POB 422, Riyadh 11942, Saudi Arabia
[8] Sunway Univ, Ctr Appl Phys & Radiat Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
[9] Univ Surrey, Ctr Nucl & Radiat Phys, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
关键词
CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110340
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A significant source of ionizing radiation for medical use is computed tomography (CT). According to estimates, more than 84 million CT scans are carried out yearly in the US. Because the neck area contains several organs and tissues that are very sensitive to ionizing radiation, such as the thyroid gland, CT for the neck region is commonly done for a variety of clinical causes. This study's goal is to assess the patient doses to radiosensitive organs and effective doses received during the CT neck surgery in the pastAt Riyadh Care Hospital, a multislice CT (MSCT) system (Siemens Somatom Sensation, 64 slices/detector) was used to perform improved CT treatments on a total of 54 patients. Patient ages were 41.5-15.5 years old on average, with a wide variation (21-73). Using computer software based on Monte Carlo simulation, organ and effective dosages were assessed. The International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) risk variables were used to calculate the patient's radiogenic risk for a particular organ. The patients' dose length product (DLP, mGy.cm) for CT neck examination were 993.3 & PLUSMN; 539.5 (267.3-2441.7). The mean and range of volume CT dose per slice (CTDIvol (mGy)) were 1.5 & PLUSMN; 3.9 (3.91-22.55). The overall effective dose (mSv) per procedure is ranged from 1.3 to 11.7 with a mean value 2.8 mSv. Patients' CT neck procedures have been repeated the procedure up to 7 times during the treatment course. The risk of malignancy is 1x10-6 CT procedure. The study showed that patients received wide discrepancies in patients' doses up to 9 times. Optimization of image acquisition protocol and scan length is necessary to reduce the unnecessary risk.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Adejoh T., 2015, HEALTH-LONDON, V7, P915, DOI [10.4236/health.2015.78108, DOI 10.4236/HEALTH.2015.78108]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement report No. 160: Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TECHNICAL REPORTS SE, V457
[4]   Radiation doses from head, neck, chest and abdominal CT examinations: an institutional dose report [J].
Atli, Eray ;
Uyanik, Sadik Ahmet ;
Oguslu, Umut ;
Cenkeri, Halime Cevik ;
Yilmaz, Birnur ;
Gumus, Burcak .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (01) :147-151
[5]   Estimating Effective Dose for CT Using Dose-Length Product Compared With Using Organ Doses: Consequences of Adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103 or Dual-Energy Scanning [J].
Christner, Jodie A. ;
Kofler, James M. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) :881-889
[6]  
Commission I.E., 2010, MED EL EQ
[7]   COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY DOSE INDEX FOR HEAD CT IN NORTHERN NIGERIA [J].
Garba, I. ;
Engel-Hills, P. ;
Davidson, F. ;
Tabari, A. M. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2015, 165 (1-4) :98-101
[8]  
Harding K, 1997, EUR J NUCL MED, V24, P1207
[9]  
ICRP, 2012, Ann ICRP, V41 Suppl 1, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.038
[10]  
ICRU, 2005, J INT COMM RAD UNITS, V5, DOI [10.1093/jicru/ndi018iv-vi, DOI 10.1093/JICRU/NDI018IV-VI]