Technology alignment and business strategy: a performance measurement and Dynamic Capability perspective

被引:31
作者
McAdam, Rodney [1 ]
Bititci, Umit [2 ]
Galbraith, Brendan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Univ, Business Sch, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Heriot Watt Univ, Business Management Dept, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
performance measures; technology management; case-based reasoning; operations strategy; strategy; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; MANUFACTURING STRATEGY; ELECTRICITY STORAGE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ENTERPRISES;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2017.1351633
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Rapid changes in market structures and technology lead to misalignment between strategy and operations. Whist this phenomenon is most prevalent in technology-based manufacturing industries, utility organisations (e.g. electricity and telecoms) provide a useful context to explore the Performance measurement (PM) and technology alignment challenges from a Dynamic Capabilities Theory perspective where there is a progressive shift towards deregulated markets. The aim of this paper is twofold: first, to explore the role of Dynamic Capabilities Theory and PM approaches in improving the alignment between business strategy and technology strategy (Level 1 alignment); second, to explore the role of Dynamic Capabilities Theory and PM approaches in aligning technology strategy with operational technology routines and practices (Level 2 alignment). In the absence of overarching theory, an inductive approach draws upon Dynamic Capabilities theory. Four longitudinal case studies are used leading to the development of a conceptual framework and propositions for multilevel technology alignment. Data from 38 interviews and 8 separate focus groups, documentation and participant observations (over a three-year period) are used. The theory-building process shows the need to identify and develop PM-based technology alignment Dynamic Capabilities (PM-DCs) which help in improving and maintaining alignment between business strategy and technology strategy (Level 1 alignment) and between technology strategy and technology practices (Level 2 alignment). This approach requires critically reflective action-learning approaches to identify and nurture these PM-DCs.
引用
收藏
页码:7168 / 7186
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Alvesson MatsKaj Skoldberg., 2009, REFLEXIVE METHODOLOG, V2nd
[2]   Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploration of How Firms Renew their Resource Base [J].
Ambrosini, Veronique ;
Bowman, Cliff ;
Collier, Nardine .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2009, 20 :S9-S24
[3]   What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? [J].
Ambrosini, Veronique ;
Bowman, Cliff .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2009, 11 (01) :29-49
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DESIGN RES
[6]  
[Anonymous], INFORM MANAGE AMSTER
[7]  
[Anonymous], SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEM
[8]  
Avila O, 2009, J COMPUT INFORM SYST, V50, P2
[9]   STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT AND PURCHASING EFFICACY: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF THEIR IMPACT ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE [J].
Baier, Christian ;
Hartmann, Evi ;
Moser, Roger .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2008, 44 (04) :36-52
[10]  
Baker J, 2011, J ASSOC INF SYST, V12, P299