Access block in NSW hospitals, 1999-2001: does the definition matter?

被引:14
作者
Forero, R
Mohsin, M
Bauman, AE
Ieraci, S
Young, L
Phung, HN
Hillman, KM
McCarthy, SM
Hugelmeyer, CD
机构
[1] Liverpool Hlth Serv, Simpson Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Liverpool BC, NSW 1871, Australia
[2] S W Sydney Area Hlth Serv, Epidemiol Unit, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05801.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To estimate the magnitude of access block and its trend over time in New South Wales hospitals, using different definitions of access block, and to explore its association with clinical and non-clinical factors. Design and setting: An epidemiological study using the Emergency Department Information System datasets (1 January 1999 to 31 December 2001) from a sample of 55 NSW hospitals. Main outcome measures: Prevalence of access block measured by four different definitions; strength of association between access block, type of hospital, year of presentation, mode and time of arrival, triage category (an indicator of urgency), age and sex. Results: Rates of access block (for all four definitions) increased between 1999 and 2001 by 1%-2% per year. There were increases across all regions of NSW, but urban regions in particular. Patients presenting to Principal Referral hospitals and those who arrived at night were more likely to experience access block. After adjusting for triage category and year of presentation, the mode of arrival, time of arrival, type of hospital, age and sex were significantly associated with access block. Conclusions: Access block continues to increase across NSW, whatever the definition used. We recommend that hospitals in NSW and Australia move to the use of one standard definition of access block, as our study suggests there is no significant additional information emerging from the use of multiple definitions.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 70
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
*AUSTR COLL EM MED, GUID IMPL AUSTR TRIA
[2]  
Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2002, Emerg Med (Fremantle), V14, P337
[3]  
BAGGOLEY C, 1998, EMERGEN MED, V10, P269
[4]   Access block: problems and progress [J].
Cameron, PA ;
Campbell, DA .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 178 (03) :99-100
[5]  
Cameron Peter, 2002, Aust Health Rev, V25, P59
[6]  
Cobelas C, 2001, J Qual Clin Pract, V21, P80, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00408.x
[7]   Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: Complex causes and disturbing effects [J].
Derlet, RW ;
Richards, JR .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 35 (01) :63-68
[8]  
Freeman Jeffrey, 2003, CJEM, V5, P283
[9]  
Hosmer D. W., 1989, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES, DOI DOI 10.1097/00019514-200604000-00003
[10]   Emergency department length of stay independently predicts excess inpatient length of stay [J].
Liew, D ;
Liew, D ;
Kennedy, MP .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 179 (10) :524-526