Establishing open science research priorities in health psychology: a research prioritisation Delphi exercise

被引:4
作者
Norris, Emma [1 ,2 ]
Prescott, Amy [3 ]
Noone, Chris [4 ]
Green, James A. [5 ,6 ]
Reynolds, James [7 ]
Grant, Sean Patrick [8 ,9 ]
Toomey, Elaine [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ London, Hlth Behav Change Res Grp, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[2] Brunel Univ London, Dept Hlth Sci, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[3] Brunel Univ London, Dept Life Sci, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[4] NUI Galway, Sch Psychol, Galway, Ireland
[5] Univ Limerick, Hlth Res Inst HRI, Limerick, Ireland
[6] Univ Limerick, Sch Allied Hlth, Limerick, Ireland
[7] Aston Univ, Sch Psychol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[8] Indiana & Purdue Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[9] Univ Oregon, Coll Educ, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
Open science; Delphi study; research prioritisation; health psychology; meta-research; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; TRANSPARENCY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/08870446.2022.2139830
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective Research on Open Science practices in Health Psychology is lacking. This meta-research study aimed to identify research question priorities and obtain consensus on the Top 5 prioritised research questions for Open Science in Health Psychology. Methods and measures An international Delphi consensus study was conducted. Twenty-three experts in Open Science and Health Psychology within the European Health Psychology Society (EHPS) suggested research question priorities to create a 'long-list' of items (Phase 1). Forty-three EHPS members rated the importance of these items, ranked their top five and suggested their own additional items (Phase 2). Twenty-four EHPS members received feedback on Phase 2 responses and then re-rated and re-ranked their top five research questions (Phase 3). Results The top five ranked research question priorities were: 1. 'To what extent are Open Science behaviours currently practised in Health Psychology?', 2. 'How can we maximise the usefulness of Open Data and Open Code resources?', 3. 'How can Open Data be increased within Health Psychology?', 4. 'What interventions are effective for increasing the adoption of Open Science in Health Psychology?' and 5. 'How can we increase free Open Access publishing in Health Psychology?'. Conclusion Funding and resources should prioritise the research questions identified here.
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1242
页数:25
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] "You cannot collect data using your own resources and put It on open access": Perspectives from Africa about public health data-sharing
    Anane-Sarpong, Evelyn
    Wangmo, Tenzin
    Ward, Claire Leonie
    Sankoh, Osman
    Tanner, Marcel
    Elger, Bernice Simone
    [J]. DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (04) : 394 - 405
  • [2] Publication rate and citation counts for preprints released during the COVID-19 pandemic: the good, the bad and the ugly
    Anazco, Diego
    Nicolalde, Bryan
    Espinosa, Isabel
    Camacho, Jose
    Mushtaq, Mariam
    Gimenez, Jimena
    Teran, Enrique
    [J]. PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [3] Towards a culture of open scholarship: the role of pedagogical communities COMMENT
    Azevedo, Flavio
    Liu, Meng
    Pennington, Charlotte R.
    Pownall, Madeleine
    Evans, Thomas Rhys
    Parsons, Sam
    Elsherif, Mahmoud Medhat
    Micheli, Leticia
    Westwood, Samuel J.
    [J]. BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [4] Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
    Banks, George C.
    Rogelberg, Steven G.
    Woznyj, Haley M.
    Landis, Ronald S.
    Rupp, Deborah E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 31 (03) : 323 - 338
  • [5] Do open access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas
    Basson, Isabel
    Blanckenberg, Jaco P.
    Prozesky, Heidi
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2021, 126 (01) : 459 - 484
  • [6] Beecher Claire, 2021, HRB Open Res, V4, P80, DOI 10.12688/hrbopenres.13321.2
  • [7] How scientists can stop fooling themselves
    Bishop, Dorothy
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 584 (7819) : 9 - 9
  • [8] An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research
    Byrne, Molly
    McSharry, Jenny
    Meade, Oonagh
    Lavoie, Kim L.
    Bacon, Simon L.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [9] Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation
    Cashin, Aidan G.
    Bagg, Matthew K.
    Richards, Georgia C.
    Toomey, Elaine
    McAuley, James H.
    Lee, Hopin
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2021, 26 (06) : 313 - 319
  • [10] The past, present and future of Registered Reports
    Chambers, Christopher D.
    Tzavella, Loukia
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 6 (01) : 29 - 42