Oral Fluid Cannabinoids in Chronic, Daily Cannabis Smokers during Sustained, Monitored Abstinence

被引:62
作者
Lee, Dayong
Milman, Garry
Barnes, Allan J.
Goodwin, Robert S.
Hirvonen, Jussi [2 ]
Huestis, Marilyn A. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIDA, IRP, NIH, Biomed Res Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
[2] NIMH, Mol Imaging Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PHARMACOKINETIC PROPERTIES; DELTA(9)-TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL; MARIJUANA; DRUGS; ABUSE; TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL; METABOLISM; PLASMA; URINE; USERS;
D O I
10.1373/clinchem.2011.164822
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Oral fluid (OF) is an accepted alternative biological matrix for drug treatment, workplace, and DUID (driving under the influence of drugs) investigations, but establishing the cannabinoid OF detection window and concentration cutoff criteria are important. METHODS: Cannabinoid concentrations were quantified in OF from chronic, daily cannabis smokers during monitored abstinence. Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)(3), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabinol (CBN), and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH) were determined in daily OF samples collected with the Quantisal (TM) device. GC-MS limits of quantification (LOQ) were 0.5 mu g/L for THC and CBD, 1 mu g/L for CBN, and 7.5 ng/L for THCCOOH. RESULTS: After providing written informed consent for this institutional review board-approved study, 28 participants resided from 4 to 33 days on the secure research unit and provided 577 OF specimens. At the LOQ, THC was generally quantifiable for 48 h, whereas CBD and CBN were detected only at admission. Median THCCOOH detection time was 13 days (CI 6.4-19.6 days). Mean THC detection rates decreased from 89.3% at admission to 17.9% after 48 h, whereas THCCOOH gradually decreased from 89.3% to 64.3% within 4 days. Criteria of THC >= 2 mu g/L and THCCOOH >= 20 ng/L reduced detection to <48 h in chronic cannabis smokers. An OF THCCOOH/THC ratio <= 4 ng/mu g or presence of CBD or CBN may indicate more recent smoking. CONCLUSIONS: THC, THCCOOH, CBD, and CBN quantification in confirmatory OF cannabinoid testing is recommended. Inclusion of multiple cannabinoid cutoffs accounted for residual cannabinoid excretion in OF from chronic, daily cannabis smokers and could reduce the potential for positive test results from passive cannabis smoke exposure and lead to greatly improved test interpretation. (C) 2011 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1136
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WORLD DRUG REP 2010
[2]   CYP2C-catalyzed delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol metabolism: Kinetics, pharmacogenetics and interaction with phenytoin [J].
Bland, TM ;
Haining, RL ;
Tracy, TS ;
Callery, PS .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 70 (07) :1096-1103
[3]   Dose-related neurocognitive effects of marijuana use [J].
Bolla, KI ;
Brown, K ;
Eldreth, D ;
Tate, K ;
Cadet, JL .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (09) :1337-1343
[4]   Oral Fluid Testing for Drugs of Abuse [J].
Bosker, Wendy M. ;
Huestis, Marilyn A. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 55 (11) :1910-1931
[5]   Oral fluid as a diagnostic tool [J].
Choo, RE ;
Huestis, MA .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 42 (11) :1273-1287
[6]   Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse:: Positive prevalence rates by Intercept™ immunoassay screening and GC-MS-MS confirmation and suggested cutoff concentrations [J].
Cone, EJ ;
Presley, L ;
Lehrer, M ;
Seiter, W ;
Smith, M ;
Kardos, KW ;
Fritch, D ;
Salamone, S ;
Niedbala, RS .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 26 (08) :541-546
[7]  
Davis KH., 1984, CANNABINOIDS, P97
[8]   Detection of THCA in oral fluid by GC-MS-MS [J].
Day, David ;
Kuntz, David J. ;
Feldman, Michael ;
Presley, Lance .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 30 (09) :645-650
[9]   The urinary disposition of intravenously administered 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in humans [J].
Dietz, Lisa ;
Glaz-Sandberg, Anna ;
Nguyen, Hang ;
Skopp, Gisela ;
Mikus, Gerd ;
Aderjan, Rolf .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2007, 29 (03) :368-372
[10]   Review: Pharmacokinetics of illicit drugs in oral fluid [J].
Drummer, OH .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 150 (2-3) :133-142