Design and development of an online formative peer assessment environment with instructional scaffolds

被引:11
作者
Alemdag, Ecenaz [1 ]
Yildirim, Zahide [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2022年 / 70卷 / 04期
关键词
Formative assessment; Peer assessment; Peer feedback; Instructional scaffolding; Online assessment design; HIGHER-EDUCATION; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; SELF-ASSESSMENT; FEEDBACK; IMPACT; SKILLS; AWARENESS; ANONYMITY; DIALOGUE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-022-10115-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although formative peer assessment (FPA) has become a prevailing learning activity in different educational settings, there are not enough suggestions on how to structure it with instructional supports in online environments to optimize its benefits. Therefore, this study aims to propose design guidelines for the development of an effective online FPA environment with instructional scaffolds in the context of writing activities at high schools. To this end, an online FPA environment was designed on the basis of an assessment model for regulated learning and teachers' and students' experiences. It was evaluated and refined three times. The formative evaluation findings suggested designing an online FPA environment with preparatory activities, information resources, goal setting and planning, anonymity, criteria form, sustainable and supportive dialog, motivational elements, and an easy-to-use interface. As a result, 11 design guidelines were produced. Overall, this research provides a better understanding of the essential design elements of online FPA environments.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1389
页数:31
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment [J].
Adachi, Chie ;
Tai, Joanna ;
Dawson, Phillip .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 37 (03) :453-467
[2]  
Allal L., 2020, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy Practice, V27, P332, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411, 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411]
[3]  
Allal L., 2010, International encyclopedia of education, V3, P348, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00362-6
[4]   Training peer-feedback skills on geometric construction tasks: role of domain knowledge and peer-feedback levels [J].
Alqassab, Maryam ;
Strijbos, Jan-Willem ;
Ufer, Stefan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2018, 33 (01) :11-30
[5]   Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? [J].
Anderson, Terry ;
Shattuck, Julie .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2012, 41 (01) :16-25
[6]  
Andrade H., 2013, SAGE HDB RES CLASSRO, P17, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452218649.N2
[7]   Promoting Learning and Achievement Through Self-Assessment [J].
Andrade, Heidi ;
Valtcheva, Anna .
THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2009, 48 (01) :12-19
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203880869-13/FEEDBACK-STRATEGIES-INTERACTIVE-LEARNING-TASKS-SUSANNE-NARCISS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, A Practical Guide to Usability Testing
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Understanding Self Regulated Learning, DOI DOI 10.1002/TL.37219956304