A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries

被引:129
作者
Fontelo, Paul [1 ]
Liu, Fang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Lib Med, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PubMed; Publication type; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Collaborative publishing; Evidence-based medicine; METAANALYSES;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Evidence-based medicine relies on current best evidence from the medical literature, the patient's history, and the clinician's own experience to provide the best care for patients. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are considered the highest levels of evidence for informing clinical decisions. Recently, reports have shown an increase in the number but a decrease in quality of meta-analysis publications. We reviewed publication trends and determined the countries with the most journal articles and types of publications in PubMed from 1995 to 2015. Methods: We examined journal entries in PubMed from 1995 to 2015 from top publishing countries for total number of publications and citations in core clinical journals and in specific publication types (systematic reviews, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials). Results: Yearly, only 30 countries generated 94.6% of all publications and 98.1% of core clinical journals worldwide. All publication types increased but with a significant increase in meta-analysis publications from China. Collaborative and co-authored papers among the 30 countries also showed an increasing trend. Conclusion: The USA leads in all publication citations and specific publication types, except for meta-analysis where China publishes more. Collaborative publishing among international collaborators is also increasing.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, FORUM GUIDE PRIVACY, P1, DOI DOI 10.17226/11583
[2]   Evaluation of PubMed filters used for evidence-based searching: validation using relative recall [J].
Hoogendam, Arjen ;
Robbe, Pieter F. de Vries ;
Stalenhoef, Anton F. H. ;
Overbeke, John P. M. .
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2009, 97 (03) :186-193
[3]   The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses [J].
Ioannidis, John P. A. .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2016, 94 (03) :485-514
[4]   The Geometric Increase in Meta-Analyses from China in the Genomic Era [J].
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Chang, Christine Q. ;
Lam, Tram Kim ;
Schully, Sheri D. ;
Khoury, Muin J. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06)
[5]   Stop Predatory Publishers Now: Act Collaboratively [J].
Moher, David ;
Moher, Ester .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 164 (09) :616-+
[6]   Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences [J].
Patsopoulos, NA ;
Analatos, AA ;
Ioannidis, JPA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (19) :2362-2366
[7]   Grading the evidence: Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation [J].
Petrisor, BA ;
Keating, J ;
Schemitsch, E .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2006, 37 (04) :321-327
[8]   Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't - It's about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence [J].
Sackett, DL ;
Rosenberg, WMC ;
Gray, JAM ;
Haynes, RB ;
Richardson, WS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7023) :71-72
[9]   'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics [J].
Shen, Cenyu ;
Bjork, Bo-Christer .
BMC MEDICINE, 2015, 13
[10]   The cost of research in developing countries [J].
van Helden, Paul .
EMBO REPORTS, 2012, 13 (05) :395-395