Positive Consequences of Conflict on Decision Making: When a Conflict Mindset Facilitates Choice

被引:33
作者
Savary, Jennifer [1 ]
Kleiman, Tali [2 ]
Hassin, Ran R. [3 ,4 ]
Dhar, Ravi [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Management, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Psychol, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Ctr Study Rat, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
conflict; choice; deferral; mindsets; goals; EMOTION; PERSPECTIVE; JUDGMENT; MEDIATOR; MODELS;
D O I
10.1037/a0038551
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Much research has shown that conflict is aversive and leads to increased choice deferral. In contrast, we have proposed that conflict can be beneficial. Specifically, exposure to nonconscious goal conflict can activate a mindset (a set of cognitive procedures) that facilitates the systematic processing of information without triggering the associated costs, such as negative affect and stress. In a conflict mindset, people should be better able to make tradeoffs and resolve choice conflict. We tested this proposition in 4 experiments, and demonstrated that priming conflicting goals before a decision increases choice in domains unrelated to the primed conflict. We further demonstrated that increased choice occurs because people in a conflict mindset process choice information more systematically, and we rule out several alternative explanations for the results.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion [J].
Anderson, CJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (01) :139-167
[2]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[3]   Automaticity in social-cognitive processes [J].
Bargh, John A. ;
Schwader, Kay L. ;
Hailey, Sarah E. ;
Dyer, Rebecca L. ;
Boothby, Erica J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (12) :593-605
[4]  
BETTMAN JR, 1993, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V19, P931
[5]   CAVEATS ON A PROCESS-TRACING MEASURE AND A REMEDY [J].
BOCKENHOLT, U ;
HYNAN, LS .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 1994, 7 (02) :103-117
[6]   Consumer preference for a no-choice option [J].
Dhar, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (02) :215-231
[7]   The effect of forced choice on choice [J].
Dhar, R ;
Simonson, I .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2003, 40 (02) :146-160
[8]   BEHAVIORAL DECISION-THEORY - PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE [J].
EINHORN, HJ ;
HOGARTH, RM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1981, 19 (01) :1-31
[9]   CONFLICT AMONG PERSONAL STRIVINGS - IMMEDIATE AND LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL WELL-BEING [J].
EMMONS, RA ;
KING, LA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 54 (06) :1040-1048
[10]   Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice [J].
Fishbach, A ;
Dhar, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2005, 32 (03) :370-377