Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems

被引:432
作者
Loken, Espen [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Elect Power Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
energy planning; Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA);
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2005.11.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Most decision making requires the consideration of several conflicting objectives. The term multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) describes various methods developed for aiding decision makers in reaching better decisions. Energy planning problems are complex problems with multiple decision makers and multiple criteria. Therefore, these problems are quite suited to the use of MCDA. A multitude of MCDA methods exists. These methods can be divided in three main groups, value measurement models, goal, aspiration and reference level models, and outranking models. Methods from all of these groups have been applied to energy planning problems, particularly in the evaluation of alternative electricity supply strategies. Each of the methods has its advantages and drawbacks. However, we cannot conclude that one method generally is better suited than the others for energy planning problems. A good alternative might be to apply more than one method, either in combination to make use of the strengths of both methods, or in parallel to get a broader decision basis for the decision maker. Until now, studies of MCDA in energy planning have most often considered energy networks with only one energy carrier. More advanced energy systems with multiple energy carriers have been neglected, even though this field ought to be suitable for use of MCDA due to its high complexity, many decision makers and many conflicting criteria. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1584 / 1595
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NONCONVEX OPTIMIZATI
[2]   Decision making in energy planning: The ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach compared to a fuzzy-sets methodology [J].
Beccali, M ;
Cellura, M ;
Ardente, D .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 39 (16-18) :1869-1881
[3]   Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology [J].
Beccali, M ;
Cellura, M ;
Mistretta, M .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2003, 28 (13) :2063-2087
[4]  
BELTON V, 2002, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE
[5]  
Benayoun J. T. R., 1971, MATH PROGRAM, V1, P366, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01584098
[6]  
Bogetoft P., 1997, Planning with Multiple Criteria-Investigation, Communication and Choice, V2nd ed.
[7]  
BOTTERUD A, 2004, MCDM E TRANSPORT MOD
[8]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[9]  
Buehring W, 1978, ENERGY SYSTEMS POLIC, V2, P341
[10]  
CATRINU M, 2004, 17 INT C EFF OPT SIM