Glioblastoma Treated with Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide Chemotherapy: Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression with Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

被引:88
|
作者
Yun, Tae Jin [1 ,2 ]
Park, Chul-Kee [3 ]
Kim, Tae Min [4 ]
Lee, Se-Hoon [4 ]
Kim, Ji-Hoon [1 ,2 ]
Sohn, Chul-Ho [1 ,2 ]
Park, Sung-Hye [5 ]
Kim, Il Han [6 ]
Choi, Seung Hong [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Radiat Med, Med Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Canc Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Canc Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Canc Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Canc Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[7] Inst for Basic Sci Korea, Ctr Nanoparticle Res, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Chem & Biol Engn, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS; RADIOTHERAPY PLUS CONCOMITANT; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; CEREBRAL BLOOD-VOLUME; BRAIN-TUMORS; ADJUVANT TEMOZOLOMIDE; LEAKAGE SPACE; PERFUSION; PERMEABILITY; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.14132632
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To explore the role of dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma on the basis of findings in entirely newly developed or enlarged enhancing lesions after concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters obtained at dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, such as the volume transfer constant (K-trans), the extravascular extracellular space per unit volume of tissue(nu(e)), and the blood plasma volume per unit volume of tissue(nu(p)). Materials and Methods: This prospective study had institutional review board approval; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Thirty-three patients with histopathologically proven glioblastoma who had undergone concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide were included. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-derived pharmacokinetic parameters, including K-trans, nu(e), and nu(p), were calculated for newly developed or enlarged enhancing lesions. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between the true progression (n = 17) and pseudoprogression (n = 16) groups by using unpaired t tests and then multivariable analysis. Results: The mean K-trans and nu(e) were higher in the true progression group than in the pseudoprogression group (mean K-trans, 0.44 min(-1) +/- 0.25 [standard deviation] and 0.23 min(-1) +/- 0.10 for true progression and pseudoprogression groups, respectively, P = .004; and mean nu(e), 1.26 +/- 0.78 and 0.75 +/- 0.49 for true progression and pseudoprogression groups, respectively, P = .034). Multivariable analysis showed that mean K-trans was the only independently differentiating variable (P = .004). Conclusion: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-derived pharmacokinetic parameters, including K-trans and nu(e), in the entire newly developed or enlarged enhancing lesion may be useful objective diagnostic tools in the differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma who have undergone concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide. (C) RSNA, 2014
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 840
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between the Prebolus T1 Measurement and the Fixed T1 Value in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging for the Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Treated with Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide Chemotherapy
    Nam, J. G.
    Kang, K. M.
    Choi, S. H.
    Lim, W. H.
    Yoo, R. -E.
    Kim, J. -H.
    Yun, T. J.
    Sohn, C. -H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (12) : 2243 - 2250
  • [2] Differentiation of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme from Radiation Necrosis after External Beam Radiation Therapy with Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging
    Barajas, Ramon F., Jr.
    Chang, Jamie S.
    Segal, Mark R.
    Parsa, Andrew T.
    McDermott, Michael W.
    Berger, Mitchel S.
    Cha, Soonmee
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (02) : 486 - 496
  • [3] Differentiation of true-progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma treated with radiation therapy and concomitant temozolomide by GLCM texture analysis.of conventional MRI
    Chen, Xin
    Wei, Xinhua
    Zhang, Zhongping
    Yang, Ruimeng
    Zhu, Yanjie
    Jiang, Xinqing
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (05) : 775 - 780
  • [4] Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Treated with Radiation Therapy and Concomitant Temozolomide: Comparison Study of Standard and High-b-Value Diffusion-weighted Imaging
    Chu, Hee Ho
    Choi, Seung Hong
    Ryoo, Inseon
    Kim, Soo Chin
    Yeom, Jeong A.
    Shin, Hwaseon
    Jung, Seung Chai
    Lee, A. Leum
    Yoon, Tae Jin
    Kim, Tae Min
    Lee, Se-Hoon
    Park, Chul-Kee
    Kim, Ji-Hoon
    Sohn, Chul-Ho
    Park, Sung-Hye
    Kim, Il Han
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (03) : 831 - 840
  • [5] Pseudoprogression of Glioblastoma after Chemo- and Radiation Therapy: Diagnosis by Using Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging with Ferumoxytol versus Gadoteridol and Correlation with Survival
    Gahramanov, Seymur
    Muldoon, Leslie L.
    Varallyay, Csanad G.
    Li, Xin
    Kraemer, Dale F.
    Fu, Rongwei
    Hamilton, Bronwyn E.
    Rooney, William D.
    Neuwelt, Edward A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (03) : 842 - 852
  • [6] POTENTIAL FOR DIFFERENTIATION OF PSEUDOPROGRESSION FROM TRUE TUMOR PROGRESSION WITH DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY-WEIGHTED CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING USING FERUMOXYTOL VS. GADOTERIDOL: A PILOT STUDY
    Gahramanov, Seymur
    Raslan, Ahmed M.
    Muldoon, Leslie L.
    Hamilton, Bronwyn E.
    Rooney, William D.
    Varallyay, Csanad G.
    Njus, Jeffrey M.
    Haluska, Marianne
    Neuwelt, Edward A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (02): : 514 - 523
  • [7] The Promise of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging in Radiation Therapy
    Cao, Yue
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) : 147 - 156
  • [8] Fundamentals of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging
    Paldino, Michael J.
    Barboriak, Daniel P.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 17 (02) : 277 - +
  • [9] Differentiation of Hemangioblastoma from Metastatic Brain Tumor using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Cha, J.
    Kim, S. T.
    Nam, D. -H.
    Kong, D-S.
    Kim, H. -J.
    Kim, Y. K.
    Kim, H. Y.
    Park, G. M.
    Jeon, P.
    Kim, K. H.
    Byun, H. S.
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 329 - 334
  • [10] Quantitative analysis of neovascular permeability in glioma by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Jia, Zhongzheng
    Geng, Daoying
    Xie, Tianwen
    Zhang, Jiaoyan
    Liu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) : 820 - 823