Think the thought, walk the walk - Social priming reduces the Stroop effect

被引:30
作者
Goldfarb, Liat [1 ]
Aisenberg, Daniela [2 ,3 ]
Henik, Avishai [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Ctr Study Brain Mind & Behav, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Psychol, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Zlotowski Ctr Neurosci, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Control; Automaticity; Stroop task; Social priming; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; INTERFERENCE; AUTOMATICITY; COLOR; CONFLICT; BEHAVIOR; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the Stroop task, participants name the color of the ink that a color word is written in and ignore the meaning of the word. Naming the color of an incongruent color word (e.g., RED printed in blue) is slower than naming the color of a congruent color word (e.g., RED printed in red). This robust effect is known as the Stroop effect and it suggests that the intentional instruction - "do not read the word" - has limited influence on one's behavior, as word reading is being executed via an automatic path. Herein is examined the influence of a non-intentional instruction - "do not read the word" - on the Stroop effect. Social concept priming tends to trigger automatic behavior that is in line with the primed concept. Here participants were primed with the social concept "dyslexia" before performing the Stroop task. Because dyslectic people are perceived as having reading difficulties, the Stroop effect was reduced and even failed to reach significance after the dyslectic person priming. A similar effect was replicated in a further experiment, and overall it suggests that the human cognitive system has more success in decreasing the influence of another automatic process via an automatic path rather than via an intentional path. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 200
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
BARGH J A, 1989, P3
[2]   Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action [J].
Bargh, JA ;
Chen, M ;
Burrows, L .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (02) :230-244
[4]   Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of social cognition [J].
Chajut, E ;
Algom, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (02) :231-248
[5]  
COHEN JD, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P453
[6]   ON THE CONTROL OF AUTOMATIC PROCESSES - A PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED-PROCESSING ACCOUNT OF THE STROOP EFFECT [J].
COHEN, JD ;
DUNBAR, K ;
MCCLELLAND, JL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (03) :332-361
[7]   EXAMINATION OF SOME ASPECTS OF STROOP COLOR-WORD TEST [J].
DALRYMPLEALFORD, EC ;
BUDAYR, B .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1966, 23 (3P2) :1211-+
[8]   The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit [J].
Dijksterhuis, A ;
van Knippenberg, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (04) :865-877
[9]   A HORSE RACE OF A DIFFERENT COLOR - STROOP INTERFERENCE PATTERNS WITH TRANSFORMED WORDS [J].
DUNBAR, K ;
MACLEOD, CM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1984, 10 (05) :622-639
[10]   The reverse Stroop effect [J].
Durgin, FH .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2000, 7 (01) :121-125