Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and 5 predicts survival after radical prostatectomy

被引:56
作者
Cheng, Liang
Davidson, Darrell D.
Lin, Haiqun
Koch, Michael O.
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Biostat, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasm; radical prostatectomy; biochemical recurrence; Gleason grading; percent Gleason pattern 4/5; tertiary pattern; high-grade cancer; tumor volume; staging; prognosis;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Morphologic and clinical heterogeneity within tumor grades is well recognized in prostate cancer. The objective of the current study was to determine whether the combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival in prostate cancer patients. METHOD. The radical prostatectomy specimens were analyzed from 504 consecutive prostate cancer patients who were treated at Indiana University Medical Center between 1990 and 1998. Various clinical and pathologic characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS. A higher combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 was associated with older age, higher preoperative serum prostate- specific antigen level, higher pathologic stage, positive surgical margins, extraprostatic extension of tumor, higher Gleason score, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastasis. In the multivariate Cox regression model, the combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 was found to be an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival (P =.04). CONCLUSIONS. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is a powerful predictor of prostate cancer-specific survival. Assessment of high-grade cancer amounts may allow for better stratification of patients into appropriate prognostic groups and treatment protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:1967 / 1972
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] HETEROGENEITY OF PROSTATE-CANCER IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS
    AIHARA, M
    WHEELER, TM
    OHORI, M
    SCARDINO, PT
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1925, JAMA
  • [3] Heterogeneity of gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinorna of the prostate
    Arora, R
    Koch, MO
    Eble, JN
    Ulbright, TM
    Li, L
    Cheng, L
    [J]. CANCER, 2004, 100 (11) : 2362 - 2366
  • [4] COMBINING PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN WITH CANCER AND GLAND VOLUME TO PREDICT MORE RELIABLY PATHOLOGICAL STAGE - THE INFLUENCE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN CANCER DENSITY
    BLACKWELL, KL
    BOSTWICK, DG
    MYERS, RP
    ZINCKE, H
    OESTERLING, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (06) : 1565 - 1570
  • [5] Bostwick DG, 1998, CANCER, V83, P1995, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981101)83:9<1995::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-2
  • [7] GLEASON GRADING OF PROSTATIC NEEDLE BIOPSIES - CORRELATION WITH GRADE IN 316 MATCHED PROSTATECTOMIES
    BOSTWICK, DG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1994, 18 (08) : 796 - 803
  • [8] Broders AC, 1926, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V2, P376
  • [9] Accuracy of biopsy Gleason scores from a large uropathology laboratory: Use of a diagnostic protocol to minimize observer variability
    Carlson, GD
    Calvanese, CB
    Kahane, H
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (04) : 525 - 529
  • [10] Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy
    Chan, TY
    Partin, AW
    Walsh, PC
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (05) : 823 - 827