Detection of Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography

被引:4
作者
Ayalon, Anfisa [1 ,2 ]
Fanadka, Feda [2 ,3 ]
Levov, Dimitry [2 ,3 ]
Saabni, Ramei [4 ]
Moisseiev, Elad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Meir Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Tchernichovsky 59, Kefar Sava, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Meir Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Kefar Sava, Israel
[4] Vet Serv & Anim Hlth, Dept Anim Hlth & Epidemiol, Rishon Leziyyon, Israel
关键词
Intraorbital foreign body; computed tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; nonmetallic foreign body; BODY;
D O I
10.1080/02713683.2021.1945108
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose We analyze the detectability of intraorbital foreign bodies (OrbFBs) of various types and sizes using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging using a three-Tesla machine (MRI 3 T). Methods An ex vivo model of sheep eyes with preserved extraocular muscles and orbital fat tissue placed in the orbital cavity of the human skull was created for this study. Foreign bodies made of four different materials - plastic, bottle glass, stone and wood - each in three different sizes (large, intermediate and small) were inserted into the soft tissue of the orbit in the extraocular space. Each orbit was scanned by CT and MRI. Images were analyzed by a senior radiologist and underwent masked review by three oculoplastic surgeons. Results Analysis of MRI and CT scans identified distinguishing characteristics for each of the four materials. This information was further integrated into a clinical algorithm. CT allowed easier identification of most of the embedded materials compared to MRI. Smaller OrbFB size was associated with lower detectability. Review of CT yielded 94.4% agreement between oculoplastic specialists in detecting OrbFbs using CT scans and allowed detection of most OrbFBs. In contrast, the overall agreement with MRI was lower: 66.7% with T1 MPRAGE, 50% with T1TSE, 88.9% with T2 TSE and 72.2% with T2 TSE FS. Plastic was the most difficult material to detect in all size categories. Conclusions CT offers a clear advantage over MRI for detecting and localizing nonmetallic OrbFBs of all sizes, except for plastic. Plastic OrbFBs can be detected with CT depending on size but are more visible in MRI scans.
引用
收藏
页码:1917 / 1922
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Ultrasound for the Detection of Retained Plastic and Undetected Metallic Foreign Bodies in the Foot [J].
Acar, Mehmet Ali ;
Kerimoglu, Ulku ;
Karalezli, Nazim ;
Gulec, Ali .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (04) :270-273
[2]   Intraorbital wooden foreign body (IOFB): Mimicking air on CT [J].
Adesanya O.O. ;
Dawkins D.M. .
Emergency Radiology, 2007, 14 (1) :45-49
[3]   Ocular Trauma: An Overview [J].
Aghadoost, Dawood .
ARCHIVES OF TRAUMA RESEARCH, 2014, 3 (02)
[4]  
Al-Mujaini Abdullah, 2008, Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J, V8, P69
[5]   Atypical presentation of an unusual foreign body [J].
Arora, Vipul ;
Kim, Usha R. ;
Shetty, Shashikant ;
Shah, Akash D. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) :338-339
[6]   FOREIGN-BODIES IN THE ORBIT - REVIEW OF 20 CASES [J].
BARTKOWSKI, SB ;
KUREK, M ;
STYPULKOWSKA, J ;
KRZYSTKOWA, KM ;
ZAPALA, J .
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1984, 12 (03) :97-102
[7]   Trauma to the globe and orbit [J].
Bord, Sharon P. ;
Linden, Judith .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 26 (01) :97-+
[8]  
Chiang Elizabeth, 2016, Taiwan J Ophthalmol, V6, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.tjo.2015.12.002
[9]  
Chowdhary S, 2020, INT MED CASE REP J, V13, P187, DOI [10.2147/IMCRJ.S246924, 10.2147/MCRJ.S246924]
[10]   Intraorbital foreign body projectile as a consideration for unilateral pupillary defect [J].
Craig N Czyz ;
Thomas P Petrie ;
Jonathan D Harder ;
Kenneth V Cahill ;
Jill A Foster .
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 5 (1)