Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation

被引:106
作者
Dijkstra, A
De Vries, H
Roijackers, J
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Educ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, NL-2300 RB Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1093/her/13.2.207
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although tailored interventions consisting of only a few pages of information lead to more quitting than no intervention in the short term, the long-term efficacy of a single tailored intervention still has to be proven. In the present study smokers were reactively recruited and randomly allocated to one of four intervention conditions: (1) outcome information, (2) self-efficacy enhancing information, (3) both sorts of information or (4) no information, Smokers in the three experimental groups received computer-generated tailored feedback containing the condition-specific information, by mail, The results from the 13 months follow-up can be summarized as follows, Compared to the no information condition, all three experimental conditions led to significantly more smokers mho had engaged in 24-h quit attempts, However, no experimental condition led to more 7-day quitting than the no information condition, With regard to continuous abstinence, the experimental condition offering a combination of outcome information and self-efficacy enhancing information had a significant effect, compared to the no information condition, It is concluded that a minimal six-page tailored intervention can be beneficial in supporting smokers to quit smoking, even after 13 months.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TIJDSCHRIFT GEZONDHE
[2]  
Bandura A., 1996, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[3]   IMPROVING DIETARY BEHAVIOR - THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TAILORED MESSAGES IN PRIMARY-CARE SETTINGS [J].
CAMPBELL, MK ;
DEVELLIS, BM ;
STRECHER, VJ ;
AMMERMAN, AS ;
DEVELLIS, RF ;
SANDLER, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (05) :783-787
[4]   FORMAT AND QUITTING INSTRUCTIONS AS FACTORS INFLUENCING THE IMPACT OF A SELF-ADMINISTERED QUIT SMOKING PROGRAM [J].
CUMMINGS, KM ;
EMONT, SL ;
JAEN, C ;
SCIANDRA, R .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1988, 15 (02) :199-216
[5]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SELF-HELP MATERIALS, PERSONALIZED FEEDBACK, AND TELEPHONE COUNSELING WITH NONVOLUNTEER SMOKERS [J].
CURRY, SJ ;
MCBRIDE, C ;
GROTHAUS, LC ;
LOUIE, D ;
WAGNER, EH .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 63 (06) :1005-1014
[6]   Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation [J].
Dijkstra, A ;
DeVries, H ;
Bakker, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 64 (04) :758-763
[7]  
DIJKSTRA A, 1996, 10 EUR HLTH PSYCHOL
[8]   ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF SELF-HELP MINIMAL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR SMOKING CESSATION [J].
GLYNN, TJ ;
BOYD, GM ;
GRUMAN, JC .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1990, 17 (03) :329-345
[9]  
HEATHERTON TF, 1991, BRIT J ADDICT, V86, P1119
[10]   STATISTICAL HANDLING OF DROP-OUTS IN LONGITUDINAL CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
HEYTING, A ;
TOLBOOM, JTBM ;
ESSERS, JGA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (16) :2043-2061