Commentary: What "community review" can and cannot do
被引:26
|
作者:
Juengst, ET
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Biomed Eth, Cleveland, OH 44106 USACase Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Biomed Eth, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
Juengst, ET
[1
]
机构:
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Biomed Eth, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源:
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS
|
2000年
/
28卷
/
01期
关键词:
D O I:
10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00316.x
中图分类号:
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
The author praises Sharp and Foster's differentiation of the forms of "community review," and agrees that the discussion is far from settled He argues that rather than attempting to define "community" by various criteria, it might be more helpful to both researchers and research subjects to enable persons to create their own communities: a process of community construction, rather than reaction.