Design concept evaluation of smart product-service systems considering sustainability: An integrated method

被引:56
作者
Song, Wenyan [1 ,2 ]
Niu, Zixuan [1 ]
Zheng, Pai [3 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Complex Syst Anal Management & Decis, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Smart Product Service System; Sustainability; Rough Set theory; Best Worst Method; Criteria Importance Though Inter-criteria; Correlation; DECISION-MAKING APPROACH; ORIENTED FRAMEWORK; CONNECTED PRODUCTS; LIFE-CYCLE; PSS; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2021.107485
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Intelligent products and services are integrated into Smart product-service systems (PSS) through information and communication technology (ICT). Various feasible Smart PSS designs are usually created in the design stage, and the design concept selection directly affects the delivery performance of the Smart PSS. However, existing methods often require more comparisons, omit criteria objective weights, and consider less about the impact of information subjectivity and impreciseness on the Smart PSS design concept selection. To solve the problems, a new integrated method is proposed, which integrates both subjective and objective weights to improve the accuracy of evaluation. Firstly, for criteria weighting, the proposed approach integrates the merits of the Best Worst Method (BWM) in reducing the burden of pair-wise comparisons when determining the subjective weights, and the strengths of the Criteria Importance Though Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method in considering the correlation and contrast between all criteria when determining the objective weights. Then, Rough Set Theory is used to flexibly deal with the decision-making vagueness without much prior information. Finally, a case study of a smart washing machine is adopted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Lect Notes Econ Math Syst, DOI DOI 10.1007/978
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INTRO DEV PRODUCT SE
[3]  
[Anonymous], JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
[4]  
Biju PL, 2017, INT J INNOV SUSTAIN, V11, P393, DOI 10.1504/IJISD.2017.086874
[5]  
Campos AR, 2017, INT ICE CONF ENG, P1465, DOI 10.1109/ICE.2017.8280055
[6]   Selection of design alternatives for smart product service system: A rough-fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach [J].
Chen, Zhihua ;
Ming, Xinguo ;
Wang, Ruichang ;
Bao, Yuguang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 273
[7]   Smart Product-Service Systems (Smart PSS) in Industrial Firms: A Literature Review [J].
Chowdhury, Soumitra ;
Haftor, Darek ;
Pashkevich, Natallia .
10TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT-SERVICE SYSTEMS, IPS2 2018, 2018, 73 :26-31
[8]   DETERMINING OBJECTIVE WEIGHTS IN MULTIPLE CRITERIA PROBLEMS - THE CRITIC METHOD [J].
DIAKOULAKI, D ;
MAVROTAS, G ;
PAPAYANNAKIS, L .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1995, 22 (07) :763-770
[9]  
Dreyer LC, 2006, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V11, P88, DOI 10.1065/lca2005.08.223
[10]   A systematic decision-making approach for the optimal product-service system planning [J].
Geng, Xiuli ;
Chu, Xuening ;
Xue, Deyi ;
Zhang, Zaifang .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (09) :11849-11858