An adaptive penalty-based boundary intersection method for many-objective optimization problem

被引:12
作者
Qi, Yutao [1 ]
Liu, Dazhuang [1 ]
Li, Xiaodong [2 ]
Lei, Jiaojiao [1 ]
Xu, Xiaoying [1 ]
Miao, Qiguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xidian Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Comp Sci & IT, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Many-objective optimization; Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm; based on decomposition; Penalty-based boundary intersection; Adaptive penalty scheme; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.040
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Compared with domination-based methods, the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) is less prone to the difficulty caused by an increase in the number of objectives. It is a promising algorithmic framework for solving many-objective optimization problems (MaOPs). In MOEA/D, the target MaOP is decomposed into a set of single-objective problems by using a scalarizing function with evenly specified weight vectors. Among the available scalarizing functions, penalty-based boundary intersection (PBI) with an appropriate penalty parameter is known to perform well. However, its performance is heavily influenced by the setting of the penalty factor (0), which can take a value from zero to +infinity. A limited amount of work has thus far considered the choice of an appropriate value of theta. This paper presents a comprehensive experimental study on WFG and WFG-extend problems featuring two to 15 objectives. A range of values of theta is investigated to understand its influence on the performance of the PBI-based MOEA/D (MOEA/D-PBI). Based on the observations, the range of values of theta are divided into three sub-regions, and a two-stage adaptive penalty scheme is proposed to adaptively choose an appropriate value from 0.001 to 8000 during an optimization run. The results of experiments show that, the robustness of MOEA/D-PBI can be significantly enhanced using the proposed scheme. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 375
页数:20
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]   Pareto adaptive penalty-based boundary intersection method for multi-objective optimization [J].
Ming, Mengjun ;
Wang, Rui ;
Zha, Yabing ;
Zhang, Tao .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 414 :158-174
[22]  
Mohammadi A, 2015, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P2891, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2015.7257248
[23]   Analysis of inverted PBI and comparison with other scalarizing functions in decomposition based MOEAs [J].
Sato, Hiroyuki .
JOURNAL OF HEURISTICS, 2015, 21 (06) :819-849
[24]   Inverted PBI in MOEA/D and its Impact on the Search Performance on Multi and Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Sato, Hiroyuki .
GECCO'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2014, :645-652
[25]   Decomposition-Based Algorithms Using Pareto Adaptive Scalarizing Methods [J].
Wang, Rui ;
Zhang, Qingfu ;
Zhang, Tao .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2016, 20 (06) :821-837
[26]   A Framework for Assessing Safety Argumentation Confidence [J].
Wang, Rui ;
Guiochet, Jeremie ;
Motet, Gilles .
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR RESILIENT SYSTEMS, (SERENE 2016), 2016, 9823 :3-12
[27]   Ensemble of differential evolution variants [J].
Wu, Guohua ;
Shen, Xin ;
Li, Haifeng ;
Chen, Huangke ;
Lin, Anping ;
Suganthan, P. N. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 423 :172-186
[28]  
Yang Shu, 2018, Small GTPases, V9, P409, DOI 10.1080/21541248.2016.1246280
[29]   MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition [J].
Zhang, Qingfu ;
Li, Hui .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2007, 11 (06) :712-731