Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value then triple-negative phenotype

被引:912
作者
Cheang, Maggie C. U. [1 ,2 ]
Voduc, David [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Bajdik, Chris [3 ]
Leung, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
McKinney, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Chia, Stephen K. [4 ]
Perou, Charles M. [5 ]
Nielsen, Torsten O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver Coastal Hlth Res Inst, Genet Pathol Evaluat Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] BC Canc Agcy, Canc Control Res Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] BC Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1658
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Basal-like breast cancer is associated with high grade, poor prognosis, and younger patient age. Clinically, a triple-negative phenotype definition [estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, all negative] is commonly used to identify such cases. EGFR and cytokeratin 5/6 are readily available positive markers of basal-like breast cancer applicable to standard pathology specimens. This study directly compares the prognostic significance between three- and five-biomarker surrogate panels to define intrinsic breast cancer subtypes, using a large clinically annotated series of breast tumors. Experimental Design: Four thousand forty-six invasive breast cancers were assembled into tissue microarrays. All had staging, pathology, treatment, and outcome information; median follow-up was 12.5 years. Cox regression analyses and likelihood ratio tests compared the prognostic significance for breast cancer death-specific survival (BCSS) of the two immunohistochemical panels. Results: Among 3,744 interpretablecases, 17%werebasalusingthetriple-negativedefinition (10-year BCSS, 67%) and 9% were basal using the five-marker method (10-year BCSS, 62%). Likelihood ratio tests of multivariable Cox models including standard clinical variables show that the five-marker panel is significantly more prognostic than the three-marker panel. The poor prognosis of triple-negative phenotype is conferred almost entirely by those tumors positive for basal markers. Among triple-negative patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the additional positive basal markers identified a cohort of patients with significantly worse outcome. Conclusions: The expanded surrogate immunopanel of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human HER-2, EGFR, and cytokeratin 5/6 provides a more specific definition of basal-like breast cancer that better predicts breast cancer survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1368 / 1376
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Basal-like breast carcinomas: clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy [J].
Banerjee, S. ;
Reis-Filho, J. S. ;
Ashley, S. ;
Steele, D. ;
Ashworth, A. ;
Lakhani, S. R. ;
Smith, I. E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (07) :729-735
[2]   Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype - A population-based study from the California Cancer Registry [J].
Bauer, Katrina R. ;
Brown, Monica ;
Cress, Rosemary D. ;
Parise, Carol A. ;
Caggiano, Vincent .
CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) :1721-1728
[3]   Statistics notes - Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method) [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7172) :1572-1572
[4]   The logrank test [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7447) :1073-1073
[5]   Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: Ready for clinical application? [J].
Brenton, JD ;
Carey, LA ;
Ahmed, AA ;
Caldas, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (29) :7350-7360
[6]   Amplification of EMSY, a novel oncogene on 11q13, in high grade ovarian surface epithelial carcinomas [J].
Brown, LA ;
Irving, J ;
Parker, R ;
Kim, H ;
Press, JZ ;
Longacre, TA ;
Chia, S ;
Magliocco, A ;
Makretsov, N ;
Gilks, B ;
Pollack, J ;
Huntsman, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (02) :264-270
[7]   The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Dees, E. Claire ;
Sawyer, Lynda ;
Gatti, Lisa ;
Moore, Dominic T. ;
Collichio, Frances ;
Ollila, David W. ;
Sartor, Carolyn I. ;
Graham, Mark L. ;
Perou, Charles M. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (08) :2329-2334
[8]   Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Livasy, Chad A. ;
Dressler, Lynn G. ;
Cowan, David ;
Conway, Kathleen ;
Karaca, Gamze ;
Troester, Melissa A. ;
Tse, Chiu Kit ;
Edmiston, Sharon ;
Deming, Sandra L. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Moorman, Patricia G. ;
Earp, H. Shelton ;
Millikan, Robert C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21) :2492-2502
[9]   Immunohistochemical detection using the new rabbit monoclonal antibody SP1 of estrogen receptor in breast cancer is superior to mouse monoclonal antibody 1D5 in predicting survival [J].
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Treaba, Diana O. ;
Speers, Caroline H. ;
Olivotto, Ivo A. ;
Bajdik, Chris D. ;
Chia, Stephen K. ;
Goldstein, Lynn C. ;
Gelmon, Karen A. ;
Huntsman, David ;
Gilks, C. Blake ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Gown, Allen M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (36) :5637-5644
[10]   Breast cancer molecular subclassification and estrogen receptor expression to predict efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines-based chemotherapy: a biomarker study from two randomized trials [J].
Conforti, R. ;
Boulet, T. ;
Tomasic, G. ;
Taranchon, E. ;
Arriagada, R. ;
Spielmann, M. ;
Ducourtieux, M. ;
Soria, J. C. ;
Tursz, T. ;
Delaloge, S. ;
Michiels, S. ;
Andre, F. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (09) :1477-1483