Influence of vertical misfit in screw fatigue behavior in dental implants: A three-dimensional finite element approach

被引:7
作者
Abasolo, Mikel [1 ]
Aguirrebeitia, Josu [1 ]
Vallejo, Javier [1 ]
Albizuri, Joseba [1 ]
Coria, Ibai [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Dept Mech Engn, Paseo Rafael Moreno Pitxitxi 3, Bilbao 48013, Spain
关键词
Misfit; screw fatigue; dental prosthesis; numerical model; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; FIXED PROSTHESES; LOAD-TRANSFER; BONE TISSUE; FIT; FRAMEWORKS; ACCURACY; PROSTHODONTICS; STRAIGHT; CAD/CAM;
D O I
10.1177/0954411918806325
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Misfit is unavoidable in dental implant-supported prostheses due to machining process or inappropriate assembling, and the definition of an admissible misfit is still a controversial issue. This work aims to understand the behavior of the screws in dental implant-supported prostheses to estimate an admissible vertical misfit value in terms of screw fatigue failure. For that purpose, a finite element model of a dental implant-supported prosthesis was created and analyzed. Vertical misfits were introduced in different positions, the lower and upper screws were tightened to the bolting force values recommended by the manufacturer, and two different occlusal loads were analyzed. In addition, two different prosthesis materials were studied. Screw load variations were reported and a fatigue analysis was performed. As a result, it was observed that the screw tightening sequence closed small vertical misfits (equal to or less than 40 mu m), whereas larger misfits (more than 40 mu m) remained open. If the vertical misfit is closed by the end of the tightening sequence, it may be considered equivalent to the ideal fit situation in regard to screw fatigue failure. The prosthesis material had no significant influence on the fatigue behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1128
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]  
Natali A.N., 2003, Dental biomechanics, P211
[52]   Evaluation of stress induced in peri-implant bone tissue by misfit in multi-implant prosthesis [J].
Natali, AN ;
Pavan, PG ;
Ruggero, AL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2006, 22 (04) :388-395
[53]  
Örtorp A, 2003, INT J PROSTHODONT, V16, P194
[54]  
Patterson EA., 1995, Proceedings of an International Symposium, P17
[55]  
Patzelt SB, CLIN IMPLANT DENT RE, P836
[56]  
Pereira Lorena M S, 2017, Eur J Dent, V11, P553, DOI 10.4103/ejd.ejd_162_17
[57]   Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques [J].
Riedy, SJ ;
Lang, BR ;
Lang, BE .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1997, 78 (06) :596-604
[58]   Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication [J].
Romero, GG ;
Engelmeier, R ;
Powers, JM ;
Canterbury, AA .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 84 (06) :602-607
[59]   Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on Dental Implant Prosthesis [J].
Rubo, Jose Henrique ;
Capello Souza, Edson Antonio .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (02) :105-113
[60]  
Sahin S, 2001, Implant Dent, V10, P85