Value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brushings in preoperative assessment of pancreaticobiliary strictures - What's new?

被引:25
作者
Athanassiadou, Pauline [1 ]
Grapsa, Dunitra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Cytol, Pathol Lab, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
bile duct; brushing; cytology; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography bile duct; pancreas;
D O I
10.1159/000325431
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Brush cytology plays a prominent role in confirming the presence of extrahepatic biliary tract malignancy. However, its value is limited by its relatively low and widely variable sensitivity values. Various factors seem to influence the accuracy of cytologic diagnosis and are attributed to sampling, technical and interpretation errors. Ancillary methods, such as immunogtochemistry, flow cytometry, image analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and the newly discovered method of global analysis of gene expression are helpful in resolving cases with inconclusive cytology and are vigorously investigated for their value in assessing the expression of novel tumor markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic and bile duct carcinomas. However, their routine use in clinical practice remains in doubt. To increase the sensitivity of brush cytology and strengthen its role in the preoperative assessment of patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancies, the following are of the utmost importance: improvement of current sampling and cytopreparation techniques, introduction of a uniform system for reporting epithelial abnormalities based on strict and clearly distinct morphologic criteria for each pathologic entity and incorporation of experience and knowledge derived from standard cytologic methods and novel diagnostic technologies in clinical practice without compromising the high specificity associated with brush cytology.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 34
页数:11
相关论文
共 129 条
[81]  
Osterheld MC, 2005, CELL ONCOL, V27, P255
[82]   Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided cytology of malignant biliary strictures using a novel scraping brush [J].
Parasher, VK ;
Huibregtse, K .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 48 (03) :288-290
[83]   VALUE OF ENDOBILIARY BRUSH CYTOLOGY AND BIOPSIES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MALIGNANT BILE-DUCT STENOSIS - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
PONCHON, T ;
GAGNON, P ;
BERGER, F ;
LABADIE, M ;
LIARAS, A ;
CHAVAILLON, A ;
BORY, R .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 42 (06) :565-572
[84]  
Ponsioen CY, 1999, ENDOSCOPY, V31, P305
[85]   ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE FORCEPS BIOPSY AND BRUSH CYTOLOGY OF BILIARY STRICTURES - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
PUGLIESE, V ;
CONIO, M ;
NICOLO, G ;
SACCOMANNO, S ;
GATTESCHI, B .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 42 (06) :520-526
[86]   Pancreatic intraductal sampling during ERCP in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer:: cytologic studies and k-ras-2 codon 12 molecular analysis in 47 cases [J].
Pugliese, V ;
Pujic, N ;
Saccomanno, S ;
Gatteschi, B ;
Pera, C ;
Aste, H ;
Ferrara, GB ;
Nicolò, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (05) :595-599
[87]   DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF BRUSH CYTOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BILE-DUCT CARCINOMA - A STUDY IN 65 PATIENTS WITH BILE-DUCT STRICTURES [J].
RABINOVITZ, M ;
ZAJKO, AB ;
HASSANEIN, T ;
SHETTY, B ;
BRON, KM ;
SCHADE, RR ;
GAVALER, JS ;
BLOCK, G ;
VANTHIEL, DH ;
DEKKER, A .
HEPATOLOGY, 1990, 12 (04) :747-752
[88]   Bile duct brushing cytology - Statistical analysis of proposed diagnostic criteria [J].
Renshaw, AA ;
Madge, R ;
Jiroutek, M ;
Granter, SR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 110 (05) :635-640
[89]  
ROSAI J, 2004, ROSAI ACKERMANS SURG, P1049
[90]   CYTOLOGIC BRUSHINGS OF DUCTAL LESIONS DURING ERCP [J].
RYAN, ME .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (02) :139-142