Value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brushings in preoperative assessment of pancreaticobiliary strictures - What's new?

被引:25
作者
Athanassiadou, Pauline [1 ]
Grapsa, Dunitra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Cytol, Pathol Lab, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
bile duct; brushing; cytology; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography bile duct; pancreas;
D O I
10.1159/000325431
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Brush cytology plays a prominent role in confirming the presence of extrahepatic biliary tract malignancy. However, its value is limited by its relatively low and widely variable sensitivity values. Various factors seem to influence the accuracy of cytologic diagnosis and are attributed to sampling, technical and interpretation errors. Ancillary methods, such as immunogtochemistry, flow cytometry, image analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and the newly discovered method of global analysis of gene expression are helpful in resolving cases with inconclusive cytology and are vigorously investigated for their value in assessing the expression of novel tumor markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic and bile duct carcinomas. However, their routine use in clinical practice remains in doubt. To increase the sensitivity of brush cytology and strengthen its role in the preoperative assessment of patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancies, the following are of the utmost importance: improvement of current sampling and cytopreparation techniques, introduction of a uniform system for reporting epithelial abnormalities based on strict and clearly distinct morphologic criteria for each pathologic entity and incorporation of experience and knowledge derived from standard cytologic methods and novel diagnostic technologies in clinical practice without compromising the high specificity associated with brush cytology.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 34
页数:11
相关论文
共 129 条
[61]  
Leung CS, 1997, DIAGN CYTOPATHOL, V16, P368, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199704)16:4<368::AID-DC14>3.0.CO
[62]  
2-I
[63]  
LEVI S, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P3497
[64]  
Logrono R, 2000, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V124, P387
[65]   Reporting the presence of significant epithelial atypia in pancreaticobiliary brush cytology specimens lacking evidence of obvious carcinoma [J].
Logroño, R ;
Wong, JY .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2004, 48 (05) :613-621
[66]   Interactive role of the cytopathologist in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration:: an efficient approach [J].
Logroño, R ;
Waxman, I .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (04) :485-490
[67]  
Logrono R, 1998, DIAGN CYTOPATHOL, V18, P338, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199805)18:5<338::AID-DC6>3.3.CO
[68]  
2-W
[69]   The mucin profile of noninvasive and invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas [J].
Lüttges, J ;
Feyerabend, B ;
Buchelt, T ;
Pacena, M ;
Klöppel, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 26 (04) :466-471
[70]  
Macken E, 2000, ACTA GASTRO-ENT BELG, V63, P254