Family control and corporate risk-taking in China: Does working capital strategy matter?

被引:6
作者
Bin-Feng, Chai [1 ]
Mirza, Sultan Sikandar [2 ]
Ahsan, Tanveer [3 ]
Safdar, Raheel [4 ]
Iqbal, Amjad [5 ]
Hayat, Mustansar [6 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Accounting, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ City Coll, Waikato Inst, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Rennes Sch Business, Dept Finance, Rennes, France
[4] Univ Vet & Anim Sci, UVAS Business Sch, Lahore, Pakistan
[5] Hazara Univ, Dept Management Sci, Mansehra, Pakistan
[6] Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Management Sci, Karachi, Pakistan
来源
ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA | 2022年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
Family control; working capital strategy; corporate risk-taking; family firms; Chinese firms; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; MODERATING ROLE; FIRM; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; INCENTIVES; MANAGEMENT; HETEROGENEITY; ACQUISITIONS;
D O I
10.1080/1331677X.2021.2013270
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study uses the data of A-share listed family firms during the period 2010-18 and employs multiple regression analysis to verify the role of family control and working capital strategy for corporate risk-taking in China. This study also explores the regulatory role of family control in the relationship between working capital strategy and corporate risk-taking of Chinese listed family firms. Results show that greater family control encourages risk-taking behavior in Chinese firms whereas conservative working capital strategy diminishes corporate risk-taking. The results also suggest a regulatory role for family control on the effects of working capital strategy for family firms' risk-taking behavior. Strong family control weakens the negative association between working capital conservatism and corporate risk-taking. This study's findings may help managers of family firms to adjust risk-taking behavior in response to changing working capital strategy. The results are robust to different measures of corporate risk-taking and working capital strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:4280 / 4299
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]  
Latham C.K., 1999, ISS ACCOUNT EDUC, V14, P255, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.1999.14.2.255, DOI 10.2308/IACE.1999.14.2.255]
[42]  
Lattuch Frank, 2019, Journal of Business Strategy, V40, P36, DOI 10.1108/JBS-03-2018-0046
[43]  
Lee KS, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P657
[44]   Institutional Reforms and the Effects of Family Control on Corporate Governance [J].
Lien, Yung-Chih ;
Teng, Chia-Chen ;
Li, Shaomin .
FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2016, 29 (02) :174-188
[45]   Managerial risk-taking behavior and equity-based compensation [J].
Low, Angie .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 92 (03) :470-490
[46]   The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms [J].
Lubatkin, MH ;
Schulze, WS ;
Ling, Y ;
Dino, RN .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2005, 26 (03) :313-330
[47]  
Martinez-Solano P, BRQ-BUS RES Q, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2019.03.003
[48]   Risk aversion, innovation and performance in family firms [J].
Merono-Cerdan, Angel L. ;
Lopez-Nicolas, Carolina ;
Molina-Castillo, Francisco J. .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 27 (02) :189-203
[49]   Corporates' strategic responses to economic policy uncertainty in China [J].
Mirza, Sultan Sikandar ;
Ahsan, Tanveer .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (02) :375-389
[50]   Family Firm Heterogeneity and Governance: A Configuration Approach [J].
Nordqvist, Mattias ;
Sharma, Pramodita ;
Chirico, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 52 (02) :192-209