Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy

被引:50
作者
Vriesman, ACV
Kole, BJ
Puylaert, JBCM
机构
[1] MCH Westeinde Hosp, Dept Radiol, NL-2501 CK The Hague, Netherlands
[2] MCH Westeinde Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-2501 CK The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
appendix; appendicitis; ultrasonography; computed tomography;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-003-1939-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the value of US and complementary CT in patients with suspected appendicitis, and to detect adverse outcomes of preoperative imaging. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 233 consecutive patients who underwent an appendectomy as an emergency procedure in our hospital, within a 2-year period. Our hospital policy is to perform diagnostic imaging in all patients with clinical suspicion of appendicitis. The US was performed in 227 patients, followed by additional unenhanced helical focused appendiceal CT in 30 patients with equivocal US results. We evaluated the negative appendectomy rate, occurrence of perforation, and our in-hospital delay. Acute appendicitis was pathologically proven in 219 patients, corresponding to a negative appendectomy rate of 6%. The US with optional CT diagnosed appendicitis with a sensitivity of 96.7%. Forty-eight appendices (21.9%) were perforated. The median overall in-hospital delay was 5 h (range 0.5-123.5 h). For the perforated appendices this was 4.5 h (range 0.5-64.5 h), for the non-perforated appendices 6.0 h (range 0.5-123.5 h). In patients with suspected acute appendicitis, US examination with the option of additional CT significantly lowers the negative appendectomy rate as compared with the clinical acumen alone, without adverse effects on the perforation rate or the in-hospital delay.
引用
收藏
页码:2278 / 2282
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Balthazar EJ, 1998, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V93, P768
[2]   Imaging for suspected appendicitis: Negative appendectomy and perforation rates [J].
Bendeck, SE ;
Nino-Murcia, M ;
Berry, GJ ;
Jeffrey, RB .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (01) :131-136
[3]   Appendicitis at the millennium [J].
Birnbaum, BA ;
Wilson, SR .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) :337-348
[4]   High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable [J].
Colson, M ;
Skinner, KA ;
Dunnington, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 174 (06) :723-727
[5]   Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis [J].
Eldar, S ;
Nash, E ;
Sabo, E ;
Matter, I ;
Kunin, J ;
Mogilner, JG ;
Abrahamson, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 173 (03) :194-198
[6]   The clinical land economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis - Nationwide analysis [J].
Flum, DR ;
Koepsell, T .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2002, 137 (07) :799-804
[7]   Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis [J].
Flum, DR ;
Morris, A ;
Koepsell, T ;
Dellinger, EP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (14) :1748-1753
[8]  
FORD RD, 1994, AM SURGEON, V60, P895
[9]   Sonography in acute appendicitis:: diagnostic utility and influence upon management and outcome [J].
García-Aguayo, FJ ;
Gil, P .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (12) :1886-1893
[10]   Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 years [J].
Jones, PF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (12) :1570-1577