Vasectomy reversal: a review on outcomes using a loupe-assisted vasovasostomy approach

被引:2
作者
Ravindraanandan, Manoj [1 ]
Ong, Chea Tze [1 ]
Elhadi, Mohammed [1 ]
Mahmalji, Wasim [1 ]
Akhtar, Mehmood [1 ]
机构
[1] Cty Hosp Hereford, Hereford HR1 2BN, England
关键词
Andrology; urology; vasectomy; fertility; vasovasostomy; microsurgery; PATENCY;
D O I
10.1080/13685538.2020.1737854
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Vasectomy is a popular choice of contraception worldwide. In the UK, vasectomy reversal is not usually licensed under the NHS with reports on outcomes being limited. Microsurgical reversal is a technique commonly performed under the operating microscope. Loupe magnification, however, is emerging as a safe and reliable technique to perform microsurgery. Method: Loupe-assisted microsurgical vasovasotomies were performed on 14 men in a 3-year period. Indications for the procedure were for fertility only. Semen analysis variables were measured against European Association of Urologists (EAU) guidelines at six weeks. Patients were followed-up at clinic in three months. Data were collated using operation notes and cytology results, and analysed using descriptive statistics. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to compare years after vasectomy, and age to sperm count. Results: The average sperm count in our group was 41.3 million per millilitre (median 29.95, range 2.7-107.8) at 6 weeks. Seventy-five per cent were found to have positive sperm motility, and all had acceptable sperm morphology at follow-up. A very low to weak correlation between time after vasectomy and age, with sperm count. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that fertility and post-operative outcomes using a loupe-assisted microsurgical vasovasotomy approach are favourable as per EAU guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1219
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Bernie Aaron M, 2012, Spermatogenesis, V2, P273
  • [2] The Evolution of Vasectomy Reversal
    Dickey, Ryan M.
    Pastuszak, Alexander W.
    Hakky, Tariq S.
    Chandrashekar, Aravind
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Lipshultz, Larry I.
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (06)
  • [3] Early male aging or poor clinical consideration for males in IVF centers? An original study
    Duca, Ylenia
    Calogero, Aldo Eugenio
    Condorelli, Rosita Angela
    Giammusso, Bruno
    La Vignera, Sandro
    [J]. AGING MALE, 2020, 23 (05) : 882 - 886
  • [4] Repeat vasectomy reversal yields high success rates
    Hollingsworth, Margarita R.
    Sandlow, Jay I.
    Schrepferman, Christopher G.
    Brannigan, Robert E.
    Kolettis, Peter N.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 (01) : 217 - 219
  • [5] Post vasectomy chronic pain: are we under diagnosing vasitis? A case report and review of the literature
    Jones, Adam
    Vazirian-Zadeh, Mahmood
    Phan, Yih Chyn
    Mahmalji, Wasim
    [J]. AGING MALE, 2020, 23 (05) : 437 - 439
  • [6] Jungwirth A, 2014, EAU ANN C BARC
  • [7] Outcomes for vasovasostomy performed when only sperm parts are present in the vasal fluid
    Kolettis, Peter N.
    Burns, John R.
    Nangia, Ajay K.
    Sandlow, Jay I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2006, 27 (04): : 565 - 567
  • [8] Loughlin KR, 1999, UROLOGY, V53, P239
  • [9] Male age is associated with sperm DNA/chromatin integrity
    Mettler, Anupama Deenadayal
    Govindarajan, Mirudhubashini
    Srinivas, Sapna
    Mithraprabhu, Sridurga
    Evenson, Donald
    Mahendran, Tara
    [J]. AGING MALE, 2020, 23 (05) : 822 - 829
  • [10] Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade
    Namekawa, Takeshi
    Imamoto, Takashi
    Kato, Mayuko
    Komiya, Akira
    Ichikawa, Tomohiko
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 17 (04) : 343 - 355