Critical approaches to literary realism

被引:0
作者
Arguelles Fernandez, Gerardo [1 ]
Vergara Tellez, Maria Teresa [2 ]
机构
[1] CONACYT, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Autonoma Queretaro, Fondo Desarrollo Conocimiento, FONDEC UAQ 2019, Santiago De Queretaro, Mexico
来源
ESTUDIOS DE TEORIA LITERARIA-REVISTA DIGITAL-ARTES LETRAS HUMANIDADES | 2021年 / 10卷 / 22期
关键词
Realism; mimesis; immanent reality; authorial intelligence; possible worlds;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
I0 [文学理论];
学科分类号
0501 ; 050101 ;
摘要
The inquiries regarding the concept of realism tend to result in an attempt to define the ontological statutes that govern the referential plausibility constituted in literary works. We can presume as inadequate this way of understanding Realism as an ontological statute of mimetic plausibility of actual history, after an analysis of the antecedents of this notion -including the oldest in Plato and Aristotle until the emergence of the theories of reflection inspired, first of all, by German idealism and then by Marx's aesthetics-. This is remarkable, especially when we want to explain the immanent realism constituted in literary fiction, considering outlines of technically impossible, paradoxical or absurd worlds. This article aims to offer some alternative cues that help to set apart this concept from those in which the illusion of reality has been limited to an equivocal sentence that maintains the literary aesthetic value in the author's ability to reflect or, if appropriate, allegorically represents the reality of his time.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 104
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Abbagnano Nicola, 2004, DICCIONARIO FILOSOFI, P891
[2]  
Adorno Th. W, 2003, Notas sobre literatura, V11
[3]  
Adorno Th. W., 1987, IDEOLOGIA COMO LENGU
[4]  
Adorno Theodor W., 2002, Asthetische Theorie, V16th
[5]  
Aristoteles Valentin Garcia, 2010, POETICA
[6]  
Asmis Elizabeth, 1996, CAMBRIDGE COMPANION, P338
[7]  
Auerbach Erich., 1996, Mimesis: la representacion de la realidad en la Literatura Occidental
[8]  
Auerbach Erich., 1946, MIMESIS DARGESTELLTE
[9]  
Bajtin Michael, 1975, TEORIA ESTETICA NOVE, P487
[10]  
Borny G, 2006, INTERPRETING CHEKHOV, P1