An Out-of-Pocket Cost Removal Intervention on Fecal Occult Blood Test Attendance

被引:6
作者
Tabuchi, Takahiro [1 ]
Murayama, Hiroshi [2 ]
Hoshino, Takahiro [3 ]
Nakayama, Tomio [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Ctr Canc Control & Stat, Osaka, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Inst Gerontol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Keio Univ, Dept Econ, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
COMMUNITY-PREVENTIVE-SERVICES; AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; COLORECTAL-CANCER; SCREENING-PROGRAMS; BREAST-CANCER; CHILD HEALTH; POPULATION; TRENDS; JAPAN; INEQUALITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.004
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: To date, no comparative study has assessed the impact of a cost-removal intervention on fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). In 2012, the Japanese government introduced a nationwide project to remove out-of-pocket costs for FOBT. The study objective was to evaluate the differential impact of the intervention on FOBT attendance in the total population and various subgroups. Methods: This study analyzed 309,103 people in national, repeated cross-sectional studies, observed pre- and post-intervention (2010 and 2013), using covariate-adjusted difference-indifferences estimates to compare intervention and no-intervention groups. The outcome measure was uptake of FOBT attendance resulting from the intervention. Stratified analyses were conducted according to sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Results: The intervention was associated with significantly positive uptake of FOBT in both genders, but the impact was greater in women than men: 6.7%(95% CI = 5.2, 8.1) for women and 2.7% ( 95% CI = 1.1, 4.3) for men in the covariate-adjusted models. Post-intervention, attendance increased in almost all subgroups in women. However, among men, some socially advantaged subgroups, such as high expenditure, high education, and public officers, showed no effect. Some subgroups such as current smokers and less than high school education were identified as hard-toreach populations that may be less sensitive to the intervention, irrespective of gender. Conclusions: This is the first comparative study of cost-removal intervention for uptake of FOBT. The intervention may increase FOBT attendance. However, the size of the effect is not great, especially in men, and differential effects occurred across subgroups including gender and socioeconomic differences. (C) 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E51 / E62
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators [J].
Abadie, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (01) :1-19
[2]   Colorectal cancer prevention in Europe: Burden of disease and status of screening programs [J].
Altobelli, E. ;
Lattanzi, A. ;
Paduano, R. ;
Varassi, G. ;
di Orio, F. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 62 :132-141
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, V32, P901
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Global cancer facts figures, V3rd
[5]  
[Anonymous], SCREEN COL CANC
[6]   Client-directed interventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening - A systematic review [J].
Baron, Roy C. ;
Rimer, Barbara K. ;
Coates, Ralph J. ;
Kerner, Jon ;
Kalra, Geetika P. ;
Melillo, Stephanie ;
Habarta, Nancy ;
Wilson, Katherine M. ;
Chattopadhyay, Sajal ;
Leeks, Kimberly .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (01) :S56-S66
[7]  
Bird C, GENDER AND HLTH
[8]   Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services -: Methods [J].
Briss, PA ;
Zaza, S ;
Pappaioanou, M ;
Fielding, J ;
Wright-De Agüero, L ;
Truman, BI ;
Hopkins, DP ;
Mullen, PD ;
Thompson, RS ;
Woolf, SH ;
Carande-Kulis, VG ;
Anderson, L ;
Hinman, AR ;
McQueen, DV ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Harris, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (01) :35-43
[9]   Changes in Receipt of Cancer Screening in Medicare Beneficiaries Following the Affordable Care Act [J].
Cooper, Gregory S. ;
Kou, Tzuyung D. ;
Schluchter, Mark D. ;
Dor, Avi ;
Koroukian, Siran M. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (05)
[10]  
David A, 2010, EQUITY, SOCIAL DETERMINANTS AND PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMMES, P199