Analytical solutions for geosynthetic-encased stone column-supported embankments with emphasis on nonlinear behaviours of columns

被引:11
作者
Zhou, Yang [1 ]
Kong, Gangqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Junjie [3 ]
Wen, Lei [1 ]
Yang, Qing [4 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Key Lab, Minist Educ Geomech & Embankment Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[2] China Three Gorges Univ, Key Lab Geol Hazards Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Minist Educ, Yichang 443002, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Geotech & Underground Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[4] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian 116085, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Geosynthetics; Stone columns; Radial bulging; Embankment; Stress; REINFORCED EMBANKMENTS; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; DEFORMATION; FOUNDATIONS; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.03.005
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents an analytical approach to predict the behaviours of geosynthetic-encased stone column (GESC)-supported embankments. The soil arching in the embankment and the nonlinear behaviours of stone columns are considered. Based on nonlinear elastic and elastoplastic constitutive models of stone columns, the nonlinear behaviours of GESCs, including settlement and radial deformation, are analysed. The deformations of GESCs, the surrounding soil, and the overlying embankment fill are compatible by applying stress continuity and volume deformation continuity at the bottom of the embankment fill. This method is verified via comparison with literature data and numerical analysis. The influences of parameters of the GESC, including encasement stiffness and column friction, on the performance of the embankment are investigated. Without considering the nonlinear behaviours of the column, the column-soil stress ratio is overestimated. It is more appropriate that the nonlinear characters of the column be considered in the analysis of GESC-supported embankments.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1116
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   Geosynthetic reinforced embankments on soft clay foundations: predicting reinforcement strains at failure [J].
Hinchberger, SD ;
Rowe, RK .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2003, 21 (03) :151-175
[22]   3D coupled mechanical and hydraulic modeling of a geosynthetic-reinforced deep mixed column-supported embarkment [J].
Huang, Jie ;
Han, Jie .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2009, 27 (04) :272-280
[23]   Modeling the Behavior of Geosynthetic Encased Columns: Influence of Granular Soil Constitutive Model [J].
Kaliakin, Victor N. ;
Khabbazian, Majid ;
Meehan, Christopher L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2012, 12 (04) :357-369
[24]   Nonlinear Model Analysis of Radial Bulging Deformation of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns [J].
Kong, Gangqiang ;
Zhou, Yang ;
Liu, Hanlong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2018, 18 (10)
[25]  
Lee D, 2007, INT OFFSHORE POLAR E, P1632
[26]   Centrifuge model tests on the deformation behavior of geosynthetic-encased stone column supported embankment under undrained condition [J].
Li, Liang-Yong ;
Rajesh, Sathiyamoorthy ;
Chen, Jian-Feng .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2021, 49 (03) :550-563
[27]   ARCHING IN PILED EMBANKMENTS [J].
LOW, BK ;
TANG, SK ;
CHOA, V .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1994, 120 (11) :1917-1938
[28]   STRIP FOOTING ON WEAK CLAY STABILIZED WITH A GRANULAR TRENCH OR PILE [J].
MADHAV, MR ;
VITKAR, PP .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 15 (04) :605-609
[29]   Comparative study on the behavior of encased stone column and conventional stone column [J].
Malarvizhi ;
Ilamparuthi .
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2007, 47 (05) :873-885
[30]   Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Analytical calculation model [J].
Pulko, Bostjan ;
Majes, Bojan ;
Logar, Janko .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2011, 29 (01) :29-39