A Comparison of the Problem-solving Skills of Students in PjBL Versus CPjBL Model: An Experimental Study

被引:5
作者
Jatinus, Nizwardi [1 ]
Syahril [1 ]
Nabawi, Rahmat Azis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Negeri Padang, Jl Prof Dr Hamka Kampus UNP Air Tawar, Padang 25131, Indonesia
来源
JOURNAL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 2019年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Problem-solving skills; project-based learning; cooperative learning; cooperative-project based learning;
D O I
10.30880/jtet.2019.11.01.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Each learning model has different pattern and approach that will affect the learning outcomes. Thus, a study is required focused on the effect of implementing the learning model so that it can become a reference for teachers. The study aimed to compare the students' problem-solving skills using Project Based Learning (PjBL) model and Cooperative-Project Based Learning (CPjBL) model implementation. The study was carried using out a quasi-experiment method. To reveal problem-solving skills, students used the authentic Assessment technique. A ttest was used to analyse data. The results of the study showed that there is a significant difference in students' problem-solving skills between the PjBL and the CPjBL model, and that these differences are strongly influenced by the syntax or stages of the instructional model. Results show that CPjBL is more effective to improve students' problem-solving skills. In PjBL model, learning activities are directed to project assignment, while in CPjBL model, learning activities of students began with motivation to achieve the learning outcomes, which were provided by modules through cooperative learning, understanding the concept and work principles through instructional media, prototype, discussion and demonstration. The cooperative learning made students group learning more structured corresponded with learning topic assigned. The students' group would continue to carry out project assignment with permanent members and learning topic. The CPjBL model is more superior than PjBL model in accordance with the ability of the students as the syntax of the model is systematically organized based on learning hierarchy.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Ana, 2012, J TECH EDUC TRAIN, V4, P30
[2]   Application of Axiomatic Design for Project-Based Learning Methodology [J].
Arcidiacono, Gabriele ;
Yang, Kai ;
Trewn, Jayant ;
Bucciarelli, Luca .
10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AXIOMATIC DESIGN (ICAD2016), 2016, 53 :166-172
[3]   Improving teamwork skills and enhancing deep learning via development of board game using cooperative learning method in Reaction Engineering course [J].
Azizan, M. T. ;
Mellon, N. ;
Ramli, R. M. ;
Yusup, S. .
EDUCATION FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2018, 22 :1-13
[4]   Project-based learning in production engineering at the Heilbronn Learning Factory [J].
Balve, Patrick ;
Albert, Matthias .
5TH CONFERENCE ON LEARNING FACTORIES, 2015, 32 :104-108
[5]   Learning Physics through Project-Based Learning Game Techniques [J].
Baran, Medine ;
Maskan, Abdulkadir ;
Yasar, Seyma .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION, 2018, 11 (02) :221-234
[6]   Collaborative project-based learning: an integrative science and technological education project [J].
Baser, Derya ;
Ozden, M. Yasar ;
Karaarslan, Hasan .
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 35 (02) :131-148
[7]   Project-based learning (PBL) through the incorporation of digital technologies: An evaluation based on the experience of serving teachers [J].
Basilotta Gomez-Pablos, Veronica ;
Martin del Pozo, Marta ;
Garcia-Valcarcel Munoz-Repiso, Ana .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 68 :501-512
[8]  
Chen L., 2004, ED TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM, V32, P363
[9]  
Chen W., 2011, International Journal of Instructional Media, V38, P351
[10]  
Eggen P, 2012, STRATEGI DAN MODEL P