Spatial mislocalization of EEG electrodes - effects on accuracy of dipole estimation

被引:43
作者
Khosla, D [1 ]
Don, M [1 ]
Kwong, B [1 ]
机构
[1] House Ear Res Inst, Electrophysiol Dept, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
关键词
evoked potentials; EEG inverse problem; dipole source localization; head surface digitization; electrode positions; 10-20; system;
D O I
10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00121-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The estimation of cortical current activity from scalp-recorded potentials is a complicated mathematical problem that requires fairly precise knowledge of the location of the scalp electrodes. It is expected that spatial mislocalization of electrodes will introduce errors in this estimation. The present study uses simulated and real data to quantify these errors for dipole current sources in a spherical head model. Methods: A 3-dimensional digitizer was used to locate the positions of 31 scalp electrodes placed on the head according to the 10-20 system in 10 normal subjects. Dipole localizations were performed on auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) collected from these subjects. Results: Computer simulations with several dipole source configurations suggest that errors in locations and orientations on the order of 5 mm and 5 degrees, respectively, are possible for electrode mislocalizations of about 5 degrees. In actual experimental settings, digitized electrode positions were typically mislocalized by an average of about 4 degrees from their standard 10-20 positions on a spherical model. These differences in electrode positions translated to mean differences of about 8 mm in dipole locations and 5 degrees in dipole orientations. Conclusions: Dipole estimation errors due to electrode mislocalizations are within the limits of errors due to other modeling approximations and noise. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 271
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION OF SPATIOTEMPORAL SOURCE MODELS
    ACHIM, A
    RICHER, F
    STHILAIRE, JM
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 79 (03): : 227 - 240
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1987, METHODS ANAL BRAIN E
  • [3] BAUMANN S B, 1990, Brain Topography, V3, P311, DOI 10.1007/BF01135440
  • [4] BUCHNER H, 1995, EXP BRAIN RES, V104, P511
  • [5] CUFFIN BN, 1979, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V47, P132, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(79)90215-3
  • [6] EFFECTS OF HEAD SHAPE ON EEGS AND MEGS
    CUFFIN, BN
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1990, 37 (01) : 44 - 52
  • [7] A PRACTICAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING ELECTRODE POSITIONS ON THE HEAD
    DEMUNCK, JC
    VIJN, PCM
    SPEKREIJSE, H
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 78 (01): : 85 - 87
  • [8] EQUIVALENT DIPOLE PARAMETER-ESTIMATION USING SIMULATED ANNEALING
    GERSON, J
    CARDENAS, VA
    FEIN, G
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (02): : 161 - 168
  • [9] HJORTH B, 1988, Brain Topography, V1, P65, DOI 10.1007/BF01129342
  • [10] EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR 3-DIMENSIONAL LOCALIZATION OF ELECTRICAL SOURCES IN HUMAN-BRAIN
    KAVANAGH, RN
    DARCEY, TM
    LEHMANN, D
    FENDER, DH
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1978, 25 (05) : 421 - 429