UAV Swarm Cooperative Situation Perception Consensus Evaluation Method Based on Three-Parameter Interval Number and Heronian Mean Operator

被引:9
作者
Gao, Yang [1 ]
Li, Dongsheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Elect Engn, Hefei 230037, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
UAV swarm; situation awareness; situation perception consensus; three-parameter interval number; Heronian mean operator; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; DECISION; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2882409
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
UAV-swarm cooperative situation perception consensus (SPC), a core part of swarm cooperative situation awareness (SA) consensus, directly influences whether a swarm could gain information superiority under complex mission environments. The related studies of evaluation indices and methods for UAV swarm cooperative SPC are not sufficient and are not very suitable for complex mission environments, e.g., battlefield or combat simulation environment, this paper systematically analyzes the connotation of swarm cooperative SPC, establishes the evaluation indices via information quality evaluation theory and proposes evaluation method of swarm cooperative SPC based on three-parameter interval number and Heronian mean (HM) operator. The proposed method includes developing a new method to represent multi-time evaluation indices by three-parameter interval number, proposing a variable weight strategy to obtain index weight and aggregating index information by three-parameter interval number weighted HM operator. The simulation results show that the established evaluation attributes can reasonably analyze the swarm cooperative SPC and the proposed approach can effectively deal with the uncertainty of situation information, the HM operator is superior to multiplicative synthesis in representing the correlations among attributes, compared to the evaluation method based on combined weights, the proposed approach has a better performance in the discrimination, which is more beneficial to the comparison of swarm cooperative SPC in different conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:73328 / 73340
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Alhussain T, 2017, INT J COMPUTER IJC, V25, P1
[2]   Heuristic Principles and Differential Judgments in the Assessment of Information Quality [J].
Arazy, Ofer ;
Kopak, Rick ;
Hadar, Irit .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 18 (05) :403-432
[3]  
Cares J. R., 2006, DISTRIBUTED NETWORKE, P75
[4]   A Self-Organized Reciprocal Decision Approach for Sensing Coverage with Multi-UAV Swarms [J].
Chen, Runfeng ;
Xu, Ning ;
Li, Jie .
SENSORS, 2018, 18 (06)
[5]   Evaluating System Architecture Quality and Architecting Team Performance Using Information Quality Theory [J].
Corbets, Jeffrey B. ;
Willy, Christopher J. ;
Bischoff, John E. .
IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (02) :1139-1147
[6]   A granular computing framework for approximate reasoning in situation awareness [J].
D’Aniello G. ;
Gaeta A. ;
Loia V. ;
Orciuoli F. .
Granular Computing, 2017, 2 (03) :141-158
[7]   A multi-agent fuzzy consensus model in a Situation Awareness framework [J].
D'Aniello, Giuseppe ;
Loia, Vincenzo ;
Orciuoli, Francesco .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 30 :430-440
[8]   Concurrent multi-target localization, data association, and navigation for a swarm of flying sensors [J].
Deming, Ross W. ;
Perlovsky, Leonid I. .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2007, 8 (03) :316-330
[9]   Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings [J].
Endsley, Mica R. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 9 (01) :4-32
[10]   Measurement of information superiority based on set distance [J].
Fang J. ;
Wang Y. ;
Yuan J. .
Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (01) :114-119